<p>Discuss April 2012 Science Questions here</p>
<p>If a colorless solution was mixed with the solid and it formed the green solution, whose viewpoint would it support most?</p>
<p>(sci 1,2,3,4)</p>
<p>Also,</p>
<p>(600<em>.9)-(600</em>.6) for number 22, right?</p>
<p>I said 3. </p>
<p>And yes i got that also</p>
<p>The entire science section was a nightmare though</p>
<p>I think it was student 2, whoever mentioned the SSC part</p>
<p>Yes for #22. </p>
<p>And 3 for the solution one.</p>
<p>Science is looking better than I expected. I was hoping for a 33, but I might pull of the impossible and get a 34 or 35 on it</p>
<p>Was the general consensus that it was hard? Seems to be the perpspective around here.</p>
<p>I just thought it was difficult to the finish. The questions were pretty straightforward but there was so much material in the passages</p>
<p>I thought the last section about absorbing some element (Sn?) was really hard to understand. Luckily, I had 10 minutes left to do it so I figured it out in the last few minutes.</p>
<p>I also found it difficult to finish. I barely made it with only about 30 seconds to spare–though I suppose for some test takers, 30 seconds would be a fortune.</p>
<p>The first half was so blissfully easy, as was the comparative one with the evaporating green solvent. The second half… just wow. Seriously, those were THE MOST complex graphs I have ever had to interpret. It basically forced those of us who like to use a “don’t read the intro, skip to the graphs and questions” strategy to read all of the lengthy and complex intro. I think the few that I missed will probably come from there.</p>
<p>On my four real practice tests I scored 36 in science 3 times and 35 once, each time with over 5 minutes to spare.</p>
<p>I also only had seconds to spare today. It was certainly harder than the practice tests.</p>
<p>I don’t know why everyone is saying it was so hard. I thought it was insanely easy compared to my previous science section (february?).</p>
<p>The science section killed me, I must have missed at least 10 of them, so I have to take it again, but I think I did really well on the first half. :P</p>
<p>I also took the ACT in february. I got a 35 on science, and thought it was incredibly easy. but i thought today’s was a nightmare…</p>
<p>In the last science passage about the 4/5 different waterways or something, would ppl like to try and figure out as many answers as possible?
-Was the control group #1
-In one of the last ones, it said by like 2002, which one could be all gone. I think i put #2 cuz although it was high in the first year, it was almost gone by the latter year
-For the last one I completely guessed H (question was about which hypothesis for #1 and 3 would be right or something)</p>
<p>what was #2. it was like the order of the 3 stages based on period of time. I dunno why, but i remember struggling on that one. </p>
<p>i think i got the answer choice (a or b? can’t remember) that was like latency, contraction, and relaxation (in that order) or something like that, ugh. yay science for screwing up my score -__-</p>
<p>for that one i put them in the order they were given in the chart, i believe it was latency, contraction, relaxation.</p>
<p>yeah i put them in the order they were in the chart too. thanks!</p>
<p>Does anyone know the last 3 problems? The answer letters themselves, I’m hoping I got them right, because I ****ed up hard on the time… I’m pretty sure everything else was good tho…</p>
<p>The control group was group 2 because there were no plants in it.</p>