Archeology, History, Anthropology...

<p>

Anthropology has long been one of Chicago’s strongest programs, but it is particularly strong in cultural anthropology. Archaeology hasn’t been neglected, exactly, but it has not been as developed or explored. Fortunately, this is being rectified in recent years, and some much-needed archaeological methods courses have been added in the anthropology department. If I remember correctly, Chicago has archaeologists studying a wide geographic and chronological span, including the Americas, Southeast Asia, and Celtic Europe.</p>

<p>[University</a> of Chicago launches first archaeological dig at site of 1893 World’s Fair](<a href=“http://news.uchicago.edu/news.php?asset_id=1373]University”>http://news.uchicago.edu/news.php?asset_id=1373)</p>

<p>Be wary of the reputation of the Near Eastern department. It’s the best in the US, no doubt, but many of the researchers at the Oriental Institute (like Ray Johnson, director of Chicago House) have very little, if any, interaction with undergraduates. The Egyptology program is in flux right now; it lost two of its four tenured faculty.</p>

<p>My plan is to major in Anthropology or Archeology and hopefully minor in Near Eastern studies with a focus in Egyptology… then ultimately go on to study a Masters in Egyptology. So the Egypt side of things is very important to me. What you’re saying about Chicago there is very interesting, Archeologist… do you think with my focus in Egypt would be better off somewhere other than Chicago? I’ve recently discovered JHU and am very impressed with their Near Eastern department but wasn’t enthralled with their Anthropology, it’s a bit too modern and sociological for my interests. But the prospect of an Archeology major is very exciting.</p>

<p>

First off, it would be difficult for you to only get a MA in Egyptology. Except for Memphis and one or two other places, most American programs lead directly to the PhD. If you’re in England, on the other hand, it would be feasible to get a MA at UCL, Liverpool, Birmingham, Oxford, Cambridge, or Swansea.</p>

<p>No, I would not recommend choosing somewhere else over Chicago. A program in flux doesn’t mean a weak program; it simply means it’s uncertain what the new focus will be. Chicago has since replaced one of the professors, and the other should be replaced by this fall, so the department should be at full strength next year.</p>

<p>If I had to rank programs in archaeology and Egyptology, it would go:</p>

<ol>
<li>University of Chicago</li>
<li>University of California-Los Angeles</li>
<li>Johns Hopkins University</li>
<li>Brown University</li>
<li>New York University</li>
<li>University of Pennsylvania</li>
<li>Yale University</li>
<li>University of Michigan</li>
<li>University of California-Berkeley</li>
</ol>

<p>Feel free to PM if you have specific questions; I’m very familiar with most of the programs. I’ve been meaning to write up synopses of each department but haven’t gotten around to it yet.</p>

<p>ninja, stand by for a long post…</p>

<p>University of Chicago- The primary focus is on Egyptian language, but archaeology offerings are available. The NELC department currently has three Egyptologists with plans to hire a fourth. Janet Johnson studies Egyptian women and Demotic. Robert Ritner studies Egyptian magic, Egyptian-Libyan interactions, and the Third Intermediate/Late Periods. Nadine Moeller is a new addition to the faculty and focuses on Old Kingdom archaeology, particularly settlement archaeology. She directs a dig at Edfu. The Oriental Institute is compiling a Demotic dictionary and does epigraphic work through Chicago House. The NELC department also has specialists in Hittite, Sumerian, Akkadian, Ugaritic, and even Elamite. The Oriental Institute museum has a sizeable collection of Egyptian artifacts.</p>

<p>UCLA- The department is strong in both archaeology and language. Jacco Dieleman is the language specialist, with interests in Egyptian religion, magic, and cultural interactions. Willeke Wendrich is the archaeology expert, with broad range of interests. Kara Cooney (whom you may have seen on the Discovery Channel) is a new hire that will be starting next fall. She specializes in the New Kingdom, Egyptian economy, and settlement archaeology. The department runs a field school in the delta, supervised by Wendrich. Like Chicago, UCLA has experts in a wide range of Near Eastern fields.</p>

<p>Johns Hopkins- The department is strong in both archaeology and language. Richard Jasnow is the language specialist and covers most things, although he is particularly interested in Demotic. Betsy Bryan is the archaeologist and directs a dig at Karnak in the Mut Precinct; she is particularly interested in New Kingdom art and archaeology. Johns Hopkins also has experts in Akkadian, Sumerian, Hebrew, and ancient law. Students have access to the Walters Museum, which has a very good collection of ancient art.</p>

<p>Brown- This department has boomed over the last two years, going from one full-time Egyptology professor to three. James Allen wrote THE definitive book on Egyptian grammar and recently came to Brown after working for many years at the Metropolitan Museum. Allen is one of the few to work in both Egyptian language and archaeology. Laurel Bestock is also a new acquisition. She focuses on archaeology, particularly funerary archaeology and kingship cults. Leo Depuydt has broad interests and works in virtually all areas of Egyptian culuture. The department recently hired Omur Harmansah, who studies the art of Turkey and Mesopotamia, and has a couple of Akkadian experts, but the Near Eastern offerings are otherwise sparse at the moment. The RISD museum has a small but good collection of Egyptian art. </p>

<p>NYU- Unlike the other universities, the Egyptologists at NYU are scattered throughout several different departments. Ogden Goelet in Middle Eastern Studies in the language expert, with a wide range of interests. Ann Macy Roth in art history is the archaeology expert; she studies Egyptian society, religion, and funerary archaeology. Roger Bagnall in Classics is a Graeco-Roman Egypt specialist recently lured away from Columbia. NYU also has Ellen Morris and David O’Connor, both of whom are fantastic scholars, but I’m not sure undergraduates would work much with them. NYU recently acquired the Amheida project from Columbia, which is a semester-long field school in Egypt open to undergraduates. Except for a couple experts in Ugaritic and Akkadian, not much is offered in other Near Eastern fields. </p>

<p>Penn- The department focuses almost entirely on archaeology, although courses in Egyptian language are offered. David Silverman has broad interests in Egyptian art and archaeology, particularly the New Kingdom. Josef Wegner is also an archaeologist and focuses on the Middle Kingdom, particularly temple architecture. Penn has experts in Akkadian and Sumerian, and fieldwork in Egypt is carried out at Abydos. The Egyptian collection of the Penn Museum is the largest in the US. </p>

<p>Yale- This is a reasonably solid department with a strong focus on language. John Darnell and Colleen Manassa have very similar interests, as she was his graduate student. All aspects of Egyptian language are covered, but archaeology offerings are sparse. The department occcasionally allows advanced undergraduates to participate in the fieldwork in the western desert. The NELC department is also home to a few Akkadian scholars. Yale has a reasonably sized collection of Egyptian art in its art gallery and natural history museum. </p>

<p>Michigan- Egyptology is fairly weak at Michigan compared to Assyriology or Hittitology. Janet Richards is the archaeologist, with an exclusive focus on funerary archaeology. Terry Wilfong teaches the language courses, but he is primarily interested in Christian Egypt (Coptic period). The Kelsey Museum has a decent ancient art collection.</p>

<p>Berkeley- This program is perhaps best avoided for the time being. Candy Keller died of cancer last year, leaving Carol Redmount the only Egyptologist at Berkeley. She focuses on Egyptian archaeology and works in the delta. The Hearst museum has a good Egyptian collection, particularly for the early periods. Berkeley also has experts in Akkadian and Sumerian.</p>

<p>Thanks for your help. I’m not sure about the financial side of things with postgrad study yet but I there are some great Egyptology MAs as you mentioned, that are over here. I will have to look into that at a later date as at the moment I’m more focused on getting in as an undergraduate.</p>

<p>Oh wow, I just posted that last message before I saw your super long one. I’ll give that a read now. Thanks in advance for the info!</p>

<p>If you go to Haverford, you can do the Archaeology major at Bryn Mawr because to the cooperative agreement between the two colleges.</p>

<p>U of Toronto also offers an undergraduate major:
[Undergraduate</a> Archaeology Programs at University of Toronto](<a href=“http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/anthropology/Undergrad/ARHprogs.htm]Undergraduate”>http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/anthropology/Undergrad/ARHprogs.htm)</p>

<p>My daughter is looking at Wash U. They list archaeology as a seperate major from anthropology. Any thoughts on their program?</p>

<p>

It’s a small but very good program, with a great range of offerings in archaeology and field methods. Susan Rotroff received a “genius grant” from the MacArthur Foundation and is a fantastic scholar.</p>

<p>Archaeologist, any takes on Middle East Studies programs at these schools? I know it’s a different field to a certain extent, but you seem so knowledgeable about these programs.</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>