<p>architecture is everything. art, science, humanities, whatever you can think of, we take part in it. We take each and every aspect and integrate in our design, our research. </p>
<p>One reason why you don't know a lot of people in UCLA in architecture is probably for a lot of reasons. First, and foremost, there really isn't a lot of undergrad architecture students here. Out of 280+ applicants, 30 were accepted. Only 3rd years were able to be accepted and transfers. I am one of those transfers who were accepted into the program. I was lucky enough to be accepted into Cal's program as well.</p>
<p>To answer your questions and those who have the same, there really isn't any consensus on how to deviate which school is better. It's like asking, is Picasso better than Van Gogh? </p>
<p>It's really based on your preferences. However, there is one major emphasis that each school concentrates in. Let me elaborate more by saying this:</p>
<p>UC BERKELEY SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN</p>
<p>VS.</p>
<p>UCLA SCHOOL OF ARTS AND ARCHITECTURE </p>
<p>From this, you can already know the basis of my argument. The difference is in the name. This is from my own knowledge because I have visited both schools and I was impressed by both of them. The undergrad department of BERK is very developed than UCLA since UCLA just started theirs last year. UCLA's grad program is more "prestigious". UCLA is very artsy, maybe theoretical. Berks is artsy, theoretical, and practical. And yes, there was a student who transfered from UCSD to here as an architecture. </p>
<p>If you kids have more questions, just stop on by to the undergrad studio. A lot of people stop and look around and I probably have a lot of questions, but are afraid to ask or either too shy. But really, just come and ask myself, or the undergrads to help any of your questions. We're all pretty nice people. But not during finals....</p>
<p>we'll kill you if you disturb us.</p>