<p>My view on college consultants is bifurcated into two categories (1) “Full-house” consultants who aim to navigate your student through every aspect of their course selection in high school, colleges they apply to, etc. and (2) “Service” Consultants who offer something specialized be it Essay Writing, Application Review & Feedback, or Interview Preparation.</p>
<p>I’m guessing that your question pertains to the former in which case my thoughts are below:</p>
<p>(1) They don’t provide anything you couldn’t get for free. </p>
<p>In my opinion, someone who’s actually been through the admissions process successfully in the past 10 years can provide just as good advice as they do. If they’re a close friend or family member, usually their advice is better as well in my opinion.</p>
<p>(2) They are jack of all trades, master of none.</p>
<p>When you pay someone to write an essay for your student, or conduct interviews and give them feedback, you are paying for something which the provider is used to, cuts their income off of, and is specialized in knowing how to “game” properly.</p>
<p>When you pay someone to consult about the entire admissions process and how your child should set up his activities, schools, EC’s, etc. how much extra value do you think they can add? Maybe, as other posters have alluded to, they can provide an extra voice which your child will listen to. Maybe they can also enhance the EC portfolio your child eventually has by encouraging them to “think big”. But in where in this entire process do they add value which can’t be derived from reading CC or talking to successful friends? You’re really just paying money to have “one source” of info, which I consider to be an unwise approach to admissions. </p>
<p>In my mind, the only services that merit you paying “top-dollar” for in the college admissions process are essay reviews, interview prep, and application review.</p>
<p>The reason why is because those aspects are things which your student does not have 4 years to figure out. The essay is so free-form in how you can approach it that most students can easily get lost in what they do. In the case of an interview, it’s quite likely their first interview that is actually truly competitive. </p>
<p>Additionally, from an emotional maturity standpoint, I think almost about half of applicants I deal with can present themselves well, it’s extremely rare for me to find someone who out-of-the-gate actually knows how to “spin” what they say correctly to actually make a substantive point in the interview that relates to what they study. It’s still amazing to me how many people (both college applicants and job seekers) still haven’t figured out the “rules of the road” by the time they’ve crossed the 10 interviews barrier.</p>