<p>Honestly, students at Williams, Amherst, Pomona, etc. are, on average, more sophisticated than your typical schmoe aiming to get into an ivy.</p>
<p>^ But are they more sophisticated than those who not only aimed to get in to an Ivy, but also succeeded? ;)</p>
<p>“If I get resumes from graduates of Bowdoin, Williams, Davidson, Carleton, etc., I’m much more likely to call them in for an interview than I am graduates of Syracuse, Boston University, UNC, Penn State, etc…”</p>
<p>The point of this post was to try to say that LACs are good, but is anyone else insulted that he’s comparing some of the top ten ten LACs to a bunch of unis that dont even make the top thirty on their own list (minus UNC)?</p>
<p>
Mmmm… depends on which ones they got into.</p>
<p>
Yeah. It goes without saying that the graduates of those LACs are the more attractive candidates.</p>