<p><<if the=“” motivation=“” and=“” initial=“” drive=“” is=“” there,=“” no=“” test=“” company=“” will=“” be=“” required.=“” blue=“” book,=“” dh1+2,=“” silverturtle’s=“” guide=“” are=“” all=“” that=“” needed=“” to=“” get=“” a=“” 2200+,=“” oh,=“” bit=“” of=“” luck=“” as=“” well=“”>></if></p>
<p>I don’t know about the particular guide that is being recommended, but I agree with some dogged working through the SAT books on one’s own. My own child’s experience is that she didn’t want to take on another commitment (e.g. formal SAT tutoring) on top of an already oversubscribed life. We were happy to pay for it, and she declined our offer. She was extremely disciplined about going through the SAT books–at least, a few tests, weekly, along with checking her answers and ferreting out the why of her wrong answers.</p>
<p>Her one and only SAT (over 2300) was a few hundred points more than her PSAT would have predicted (which I don’t think, frankly, is a great predictor). I think my daughter improved, in part, because she did the dynamic of taking a standardized test, repeatedly, but I also think she improved simply because she aged. She was an older, better test-taker–her executive order function had improved–and she is a kid who is a year to a year and-a-half than her grade peer group.</p>
<p>Some very capable kids are just inherently good or poor standardized test takers. We don’t know anyone who was “hyper-tutored” and then improved dramatically. We know a lot of kids with private tutors who improved somewhat. A lot of her friends–all excellent students–feel like the private weekly sessions were a waste of time, not that they didn’t do well,even though they reported scores of 2150 to 2300+. They just didn’t credit the tutoring with the improvement. </p>
<p>My daughter also feels that her SAT score was her doing, and I think that that is a great and necessary confidence booster, especially as she makes her way out into the world.</p>
<p>Interestingly, my daughter did no review for the SAT II (subject) tests and got over 730+ on them. She felt that those tests were much more curriculum-based and pretty much tested what she had learned in school, concretely.</p>
<p>If you have a disciplined student, go for the workbook and no tutor approach, maybe, or, alternatively, maybe have your kid ply his/her way through the workbooks and then isolate what are recurrent mistakes for him/her on the test and take those questions to a tutor.</p>
<p>185/hr seems prohibitive unless you are talking about NY city, proper, where I have heard private tutoring can be 500/hr., which I think is better spent on therapy for the over-stressed, over-subscribed high schooler, frankly.</p>