<p>So currently I'm a 2nd year at UCLA and I'm a History major and Public Affairs minor. I would like to get a MPA/MPP in the future.</p>
<p>For my major and minor, I don't need to take any econ, stats, or math classes. So...I haven't taken any...and I don't really plan to since it's not necessary.</p>
<p>I looked at the requirements at schools like UCLA, USC, and UC Berkeley and it seems their requirements are just high gpa, high GRE score, work experience, etc. However, I have also read for some other schools that they require at least a course in an intro stats and into microeconomics class.</p>
<p>One reason this is such a debate for me is because the microeconomics classes at UCLA are weeder classes and major gpa killers. I mean, it's not that I don't enjoy econ, it's just that if it's not necessary, why should I take it and risk deflating my gpa? I'd rather apply to grad school with the highest GPA possible.</p>
<p>In terms of work experience, I would hope I am on the right track. This summer I have an internship lined up with an attorney and will be assisting her with immigration documents (not exactly public policy, I know) and next year I will be working at JusticeCorp/AmeriCorp for a year (er...again not specifically related to Public Policy, but many students work at PeaceCorp or AmeriCorp before applying for MPA/MPP), and my senior year (hopefully) I will be going to Washington DC for a quarter for research.</p>
<p>I guess my question is, given the internship, volunteer, research experience, good GPA, and good GRE score, would that be necessary to get into a solid MPA/MPP program like at UCLA, USC, Cal? I mean do I have to take at least 1 intro econ class and 1 intro stats course? Or does it not matter and it's just one of those "I HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT" things...?</p>