Are these bad SAT II scores? Opinions please!

<p>From January 2014:
Bio E: 760
Math II: 800
Literature: 720</p>

<p>A million times better than mine. Good enough for Ivy Leagues, seriously. </p>

<p>You are kidding right? If a perfect score isn’t good, what is? </p>

<p>Seriously, are you kidding me?!! :open_mouth: This is such an amazing score! Far far far better than mine! </p>

<p>In my opinion these are very good score. Math is perfect and Bio E is close to it. I think you’re Lit score is high too, if you honestly feel that you could do better on this test another time around then by all means retake it. I would make sure that the colleges you’re applying to accept the higher of the two scores in case your 720 ends up being the best of the two. But really, nice work.</p>

<p>But guys, is biology bad? I feel like I am bad at bio now and I am taking the AP exam this May. Is this score a predictor of potential failure on AP? </p>

<p>Bio - Good
Math II - Excellent
Lit - Respectable</p>

<p>IMHO,
Bio - okay okay
Math II - Good
Literature - Very good (although I know people who’ve scored 800s, you’re percentile would be very high)</p>

<p>^ Indeed, the Literature score at 720 has the lowest percentile among all 3.
<a href=“http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/research/SAT-Subject-Tests-Percentile-Ranks-2013.pdf”>http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/research/SAT-Subject-Tests-Percentile-Ranks-2013.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>19% students got >720 in Literature while only 10% got >760 in E Biology. Obviously, no one get >800 in Math2.</p>

<p>I forgot she said Bio E, silly me. That’s a really good score for the ecological component. Well done.</p>