<p>^ I think you’re making way too many assumptions about how admissions works. e.g.
“Would someone agree that a 750 in Math 2 from a kid who never sat through a Calc course is much more impressive than someone with the same score who did? Of course”</p>
<p>I sure as hell would want a kid who took calc and did well in math 2 over a kid who didn’t take calc and did well in math 2. Calc isn’t even covered in the math 2 test; therefore, the kid who has the more rigorous schedule wins.</p>
<p>In summary, there’s no need to call people arrogant. We can have a debate without name-calling.</p>