<p>Gay marriage is absolutely repulsive and as disgusting as beastiality.</p>
<p>I would think there would be much anger/jealous issues in a polygamy relationship.</p>
<p>^^Oh, so now you’re comparting human beings to farm animals and pets?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I think we can agree that your opinion on anger issues in poly-amorous relationships shouldn’t determine whether polygamy is legal.</p>
<p>I’m sure heterosexual relationships have their issues although heterosexual marriages are currently legal.</p>
<p>Nope. The act is against the principles of nature. End of this disgusting discussion!</p>
<p>^^Yeah, I know there is a 50% divorce rate in America. That is why I plan to not get married. I mean, I am not saying I will want to be lonely for the rest of my life. But what does a piece of paper really mean? I am the type of person who starts to get annoyed by people. I cannot see myself living under the same roof with somebody for many years! I just can’t do it. That does not mean I do not think homosexuals should not get married, because many people want to have that experience of a marriage. I’m just not one of them. I guess if individuals want to try a polygamy relationship, why not? It’s not hurting me. But I would not necessarily compare it to gay marriage.</p>
<p>^Just because you believe it to be “disgusting” does not mean this discussion is over. One person’s morals should not determine how another person can live his or her own life.</p>
<p>"Now, proving my hypocrisy, but really just not wasting time responding to each post, I believe, as others believe, that homosexual is simply unnatural. As others have also pointed out, nature has intended for a male and female to link rather than a male with a male or a female with a female. There can be no argument against this. It is an indsiputable fact that the male sex organs are only suited for female sex organs.</p>
<p>But jokes aside, “unnatural” means not occuring in nature. There are gay animals, in the wild, in nature. This therefore renders your point moot.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>And what if it does hurt you? What if the legalization of polygamy reduces the efficiency of IRS audits & form completions because of increased tax code complications (how can different members of this marriage file their taxes–are their exemptions and deductions different from monogamous marriages? Who is going to keep up with the increased complications in filling out a 1040; will you now need to pay a tax filer/accountant more for the same job?)</p>
<p>If this raises the federal budget that needs to be allocated to certain sectors (in this example, IRS), are you for funding these changes with your tax dollars? Are you willing to pay to allow polygamy?</p>
<p>I really don’t have the desire to teach simpletons of the ramifications of what nature itself says is dead wrong. Fools will not listen to reason. So, I will not waste my time. See ya</p>
<p>I really never post on threads like this but I found post#30 by emorylegacy to be hilarious. Im lovin the logic emorylegacy XD</p>
<p>“if marriage was strictly religious then atheists should be banned from marriage” LOL</p>
<p>Homosexuality is immoral? That’s exaclty what men said when women wanted to be let out of the house during womens suffrage and America is already and has been for the past 125 years in moral decay. Please, have a strong argument when posting.</p>
<p>How did this turn from gay marriage to polygamy? Plus, we pay taxes for the stupidest stuff anyway. So, what exactly is the point?</p>
<p>^There doesn’t need to be a point to anything on the interwebs, hon.</p>
<p>Haha has anybody ever read the book Candide??
It really has nothing to do with this topic, but the main message is that everyone should cultivate his/her own garden to make the world a better place (metaphorically) and I agree with this.
If everyone just shut up and stopped arguing about other people’s business and focused on his/her own life then it would be so much more peaceful!!</p>
<p>I’m not gay, but I don’t think being straight makes you superior and gives you the right control other people’s lives just because that person is different from you. I haven’t read this whole thread, just answering the main question. The main point is that a gay couple may be in love and care about each other just like a straight couple so who is anyone to stop them?</p>
<p>I think the world would be more peaceful without religion, that is just my opinion. So now we would only be going to war for land, oil, and money! lol.</p>
<p>So first you say that homosexuality is wrong because it goes against nature, and NOW you say that nature isn’t always right. THEN you go on to call everyone else simpletons when you have added to valid point to the discussion!</p>
<p>“I really don’t have the desire to teach simpletons of the ramifications of what nature itself says is dead wrong. Fools will not listen to reason. So, I will not waste my time. See ya”</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>The point is that a homosexual better be willing to pay extra taxes to support polygamy if he expect me, as a heterosexual with no particularly strong support for gay marriage, to fund his privileges in marriage.</p>
<p>TrueLove: you have shown no reason to justify banning gay marriage in any of your posts, just the effects of the close-minded environment you have lived in. So I thank you for leaving the thread and letting others who can construct an argument without having to resort to childish name calling resume the discussion.</p>
<p>Everyone against gay marriage seems to support their argument with “it’s immoral”- can ANYONE with this position tell me what makes it immoral?</p>
<p>But you got to look at it in their shoes. If you were deeply in love with somebody and everybody dispised you for loving out of the norm; made you pay extra taxes to marry this person; you get looked down upon everyday because it is “immoral”. How would you feel?</p>