<p>Hello,</p>
<p>So we have been looking into schools for our junior son, fresh from the rollercoaster ride of finding a school for our daughter (frosh this year). His interests are studio art and math but his interests and talents are wid. For example he doesn't particularly like Chem...but achieved the highest average in Chem in his entire school. Another example: self-studied a 5 in Euro History. So far he has a 100 average (W), will have done 10 APs by graduation. First PSATs (will take again) was 710 CR and 690 M which he didn't have time to finish, will probably do better next month now that he knows how to improve speed strategies. He was chosen to attend an extremely cmpetitive free math camp at Williams over the summer.</p>
<p>Can you tell I'm a proud mom :)</p>
<p>S himself says he doesn't want to go to art school necessarily because 1) he also loves math, and 2) he may want to pursue a law degree. He has also expressed interest in an MFA; a masters in curatorial studies; and a PhD in math, art history or some related field.</p>
<p>Here is the point of this post.</p>
<p>Since grad school is in his future (according to him, the more the better!), all this time I have been focusing on getting him into the "best" school, preferably an LAC although there are also a couple of small universities on our list. Our EFC is 0 and the top schools offer the most need-based aid. Questbridge schools are pretty much the basis of the list, because even if he isn't matched, we figure they are good bets for need-based aid.</p>
<p>After talking to his art teacher (he takes classes at a local art school), I am realizing that I have been taking a different strategy from the one which the teacher suggests. To be clear, he (the teacher) does not "push" for kids to only attend an art school. However the portfolio development aspect is new to me...as is the idea that WITHIN studio art there are many, many subjects (graphic design, illustration, etc). So seeing a college on a list of schools with "strong" studio art doesn't tell you if it is the KIND of art your kid wants to study. He likes oil painting, loves Dutch masters, Renassaince (sp?), European painting and Greco-Roman sculpture. But he also was at one time fascinated by classical architecture. </p>
<p>To put it in a nutshell, I have been looking at top LAC/small universtiy schools with reps for strong Studio Art...when we should be looking at strong ART LACs/universities which will allow him to do more than art?</p>
<p>Does this make sense? Advice from parents? Students in the same boat?</p>
<p>OLD LIST
High reaches: Yale, Columbia, Brown
Low reaches: Tufts, Pomona, Amherst,* Swat,** Williams
Match: Vassar, Wesleyan, Haverford**
Boston College has a Presidential scholarship; the only non QB school on our old list.</p>
<p><em>cross-reg within 5 colleges= more art option
*</em>cross-reg with Bryn Mar, UPenn and each other = more art options </p>
<p>Thanks for listening to this rambling post. Please send any suggestions re. schools, approach, reality check for parents, etc. </p>
<p>Ironically my opinion is the opposite of many people's: I think art school grads will find jobs and make money IF it is their passion. My in-law was not academically motivated, loved art. Parents sent him to a private u, not art school because they worried he wouldn't find a job later. He now does computer digital-whatever BUT he probably would have gotten a better job graduating from an art school, in the same field.</p>