I have to say - I don’t think that these NYC private schools are really making any impact by reducing the problem of lack of inclusiveness to race. Saying that there is “unearned white privilege” is overly simplistic and negates any effort to tackle real problems.
I am not trying to be insensitive, but when was the last time a kid was depressed and on the brink of suicide (or actually committed suicide) just because they were NOT white. There is always something else besides simply race that is not being addressed by these overhyped seminars. I think that the “It gets better” campaign aimed at homosexual kids is a much better approach. Or the “Free to be you and me” campaign in the 70s and 80s.
Recognizing that there are bullies and that high school is a difficult time for everyone who feels different (which is almost everyone) will be more effective in achieving the goal of inclusiveness and celebration of different ideas, cultures, and ethnicities. Exposing bullies as ignorant and insecure oafs whose behavior will not be tolerated is more effective than pointing out the obvious privilege given to wealthy individuals (which is where the real unearned privilege is because those kids did nothing to earn that wealth).
The article strengthens the argument to avoid these segregated day schools and look to boarding schools where kids are living, playing, and learning together (ideally) if inclusiveness is desired. This principle is part of the long-term strategic plan of most boarding schools and not just a special day with a press release for the new york times.