<p>QUICK!!! i need equations!!! any academic papers?</p>
<p>lol i knew you'd mock my term :D</p>
<p>lmao! 10char.</p>
<p>See, I'm hardcore, and I take you seriously. </p>
<p>Book:
White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness
White</a> Women, Race Matters: The ... - Google Book Search</p>
<p>How to Date a White Woman: A Practical Guide for Asian Men
Amazon.com:</a> How to Date a White Woman: A Practical Guide for Asian Men: Adam Quan: Books</p>
<p>Quinsaat, J. (1976). Asians in the media, The shadows in the spotlight. Counterpoint: Perspectives on Asian America</p>
<p>Sheridan Prasso, The Asian Mystique: dragon ladies, geisha girls, & our fantasies of the exotic orient, PublicAffairs, 2005.</p>
<p>Research Papers:
Masculinity politics in Asian American and White American interracial relationships
Masculinity</a> politics in Asian American and White American interracial relationships</p>
<p>Claire Jean Kim, "The Racial Triangulation of Asian Americans," Politics & Society, Vol 27. No. 1, March 1999, 105-138.
Pine</a> Forge Press - Unexpected Exception</p>
<p>Intimate relationships between races more common than thought
University</a> of Michigan</p>
<p>The Rates, Patterns and Reasons for Forming Heterosexual Interracial Dating Relationships among Asian Americans
The</a> Rates, Patterns and Reasons for Forming Heterosexual Interracial Dating Relationships among Asian Americans -- Fujino 14 (6): 809 -- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships</p>
<p>^the comments on the amazon page:
[quote]
**Nathaniel Ng "white women love me!"</p>
<p>Personally, I am an Asian man. And by Asian, I mean Asian. When I got this book, I realized the error of my white-woman-hunting-ways. Now that I've seen the light, I can lure them in like moths to the fire. THANKS Adam Quan! My love life is more bubbly than a 100 degree pot in high altitude.**
[/quote]
</p>
<p>
[quote]
I personally found the book lacking, in what I like to call "chutzpah". I gave this book to a friend who needed some help and the "step-by-step guide" provided in this tome is anything but. In many cases he found the steps to be nebulous, ambagious, and even geared towards the derelict reader. The book, as a whole, was definitely not multifarious. I would not extol this literary work.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>^ holy contrived vocabulary usage, Batman!</p>
<p>Haha, I love reading comments. One of my favorite was on The Economist, where someone wrote, "There are fart better things to make a graph about." I lol'ed after seeing that on the website of a fancy financial magazine.</p>