<p>Question: In another thread you mentioned that you liked the student body type, academic scene, athletic scene, social scene, and level of intellectualism better at swarthmore and several other schools. Could you comment on what these things are like at Vassar and how you feel they compare to other LACs?</p>
<p>Answer: Indeed. When I applied to college last year, Swarthmore was my ED school while Amherst was my second choice., the University of Pennsylvania my third, and Vassar was number four. Seeing as you asked only about LACs; however, I'll forgo comparing Vassar and Penn and focus on discussing similarities and differences (as I see them) between Vassar, Swarthmore, and Amherst. This is by no means official, so consider it a personal take on the three.</p>
<pre><code> Politically-speaking, I'd say that both Swarthmore and Vassar are on the extreme end of "liberal" when one looks at the LACs nationwide. Swarthmore strikes me as more politically active; however, Vassar has its fair share of activists. In contrast, Amherst comes across as more moderate. All three schools seem to be, however, very open and accepting to different "types" of people: Amherstians just come across as a bit more buttoned up than their Vassar and Swarthmore peers.
From the standpoint of a school where athletics is a prime extracurricular, Amherst is by far the best option, in my opinion. At Swarthmore, the focus of students seems to be more on academics and activism (or the students I've chatted with from Swarthmore came across like that) while those at Vassar are more focused on the arts, as well as activism to a lesser extent. That's not to say that Amherst is a total jock school or that Swarthmore and Vassar completely lack student-athletes: it's just that sports seems to be "a bigger deal" at Amherst while the arts are more focused on by Vassarites and activism by Swatties.
Academically, I personally feel that all three schools are superb (that's why I applied to all three, after all). Swatties are particularly known for being "intellectuals" while Amherstians are stereotypically quite competitive, academically-speaking; however, I don't know enough of them to say whether or not these perceptions are true. I can say, however, that Vassar has its fair share of "bright" people and that students aren't particularly competitive with one another here, when dealing with academics at least.
From the standpoint of a social scene, all three schools have their positives and negatives. Amherst, for instance, has--what seems to me at least--the fantastic advantage of the Five College community, which doubtless adds to the amount of social events available to its students. At the same time, however, it is located in a relatively rural area, which means that city access isn't so easy. In contrast, Vassar offers its students access to New York City, as well as a better developed (if less well to do) surrounding area. The social scene does, however, feel a bit like a bubble at times, in that there's less of a dynamic between the surrounding community and the campus. Moving on.... Swarthmore offers students access to Philadelphia, and also a consortium with Haverford and Bryn Mawr. I would thus say that Swatties have the best social scene available to them out of the three student populations being compared because they have both city access and a larger community to get involved in. That's not saying that there's nothing to do at Amherst or Vassar: it just seems that Swarthmore could potentially offer the best social mix.
</code></pre>