Ask a recent Stanford grad & admissions interviewer (almost) anything!

@sansculottes So classes I really enjoyed:

PSYCH 1, intro psych, co-taught by Professor James Gross & Dr. Bridgette Hard in fall quarter
PSYCH 45, learning & memory, by Professor Anthony Wagner
BIO 158, dev neurobio, by Professor Susan McConnell
PSYCH 120/BIO 153, cellular & molecular neuro, by Professor Jeff Wine

I gotta warn you though, most of my favorite classes I took were upperdiv life sciences, and many of them will not be very beginner friendly to someone without a strong bio background (like BIO 158).

There’s not really a one size fits all EC, so you’ll probably want to ask ppl with closer interests to your own–as you can imagine, my EC list was largely medical and neuro related. I know that some of my humanities friends got quite involved with the student-run publications (e.g., Herodotus for history). I would also strongly recommend considering staffing in a frosh dorm eventually, but that’s a little ways off for you :slight_smile:

Thank you so much! Will definitely bear all that in mind xx

are intosems a requirement

@LordBendtner

No.

I’m applying RD this year, and I had a question about recommendations. Does it truly matter if your recommendation letters don’t come from teachers of different subjects? I’m undecided but leaning towards the International Relations major. Both of my recommendations are most likely going to come from history teachers. I can choose another teacher, but she wouldn’t know me as well.
Also, how easy is it to change your major?
Thank you! :slight_smile:

I chose the teachers I thought would give me the best recommendation and knew me the best. IMO the best possible recommendation is more important than the subject taught by the teacher. The exception to this is the student who knows what he/she wants to major in and makes it clear in their essay they have decided on a major. Maybe Era991 has a different opinion about this.

I believe you can change your undergrad major any time you want and you don’t even half to declare a major until your junior year. The only tricky part is choosing courses that can be used for all of the possible majors or you may end up taking additional classes to get your degree.

On the topic of interesting classes to take, I won’t give specific suggestions because everyone has different interests and motives for taking classes.

My favorite class freshman year was Physics 61 (Mechanics and Special Relativity). It was the most difficult class I had taken up to that point, the most grueling, and the most enjoyable. I spent a ridiculous 25 hours each week doing problem sets and loved every minute of it.

The professor at the time was Roger Blandford who was one of the world leaders in his field. I still remember the first time I talked to him after class. We engaged in a twenty minute discussion. I went away stunned someone of his stature would spend so much time talking to me. I hear it is taught by some other professor now and is not nearly as rigorous.

OMG you took physics 61? I barely survived the 20 series. HAHAHA.

My best class was Sleep and Dreams by Dr. Dement. I hear he is getting ready to retire so if he has not yet, HURRY. I also adored the more advanced psych classes (like early childhood development…). The psych professors are fantastic, very personable and so eager to teach and recruit you for research help! It gave me a lot of opportunities. You have to get through Psych 1 first or skip via AP because that class is a zoo, is huge and probably not a good impression of the major.

@kath00 Yeah I feel you, I was so glad to be able to forget my 20 series material after passing the MCAT (not trying to go into ortho or ophtho). I heard horror stories about 60 series…can’t even imagine…kudos to you @googledrone

@ambikav99 First off, I just want to reiterate that I’m an alumni interview, not an admissions committee member; we’re not privy to the “secret sauce” recipe of Montag Hall, so I really couldn’t tell you for sure the difference will be between submitting two weaker letters from different departments vs. two stronger letters from the same dept. Surprisingly, I know more about med school admissions, which is much more demystified and welcomes student/alumni participation. I can tell you about my own person thinking when I chose my own rec letters that ended up working out for me, but remember that what follows is an anecdote and n=1.

I think googledrone gave you good advice above. Obviously, if a school specifically requests LORs different subject areas, then follow their requirements.

The most important question in my mind when selecting LOR writers was, “What can they say about me, and how much can they say about me?” Some instructors knew me since kindergarten, were my advisors, taught me in several classes, and saw me grow for years; they could easily fill up the customary 1.5-2 pages of LOR.

On the other hand, I may have been one of only 2 people in a class to get an A+, but if it was a large lecture class and I never went to office hours, how meaningful would that rec letter really be in the end? They might even be able to write an amazing two sentences about me: “Era991 was among the top 1% of students I’ve ever had, and his/her understanding of Topic X was unrivaled. I only gave out two A+'s this quarter, and he/she was one of them.” That’s a pretty great opening to a LOR, but after that they’d be sure to get stuck, and be unable to write a substantive letter simply because they didn’t know me well enough. Some of them probably couldn’t even fill up a full page about me.

In my own experience of both reading and writing LORs, it can be quite obvious how well the writer knows the applicant by the way they write about them. Perhaps it’s just the type of LOR I read and write, but I would much prefer to hear about concrete examples of teamwork, gregariousness, emotional intelligence, composure under pressure, and conflict-resolution abilities rather than simple academic aptitude, and the former requires much more familiarity.

So I always chose the strongest writers I could find for my own LORs, so long as they fit within the explicit requirements of the institution. Worked out for me just fine in the end. But take it with a grain of salt. Again, my opinion here may or may not jive with Montag Hall’s.

What are the Wilbur dorms like? How about the food? Is it common to eat at other dining halls? Thanks x

The admission rate to Stanford is so small that the student body is obviously outstanding. Were you ever intimidated by your peers?

@sansculottes I’m not quite sure what you mean about the Wilbur dorms. You can find floor plans, general descriptions, and pictures/videos of the dorms and rooms online. In general, most frosh get placed in an all-frosh Wilbur or Stern complex dorm, which general have ~70 frosh and 6 upperclassmen staff members (4 RAs, 1 PHE, 1 RCC), with a few exceptions. Wilbur dining has Asian influences and is also known for weekend brunches, while Stern has hispanic influences and is known for burrito bowls. As a general rule, most frosh spend the majority of their meals in their home dining hall, with some intermingling between Stern and Wilbur. I would strongly recommend you eventually explore other dining halls–this may even determine how you rank your housing choices for sophomore year–especially if your staff offer dining hall tours as programming. (DHall themes: Manz Mediterranean, Branner same as Manz but fewer choices but also shorter lines, Arrillaga meh but also veggie/vegan friend and more choices, Flomo Indian, Ricker allergy-friendly and chocolate, Lag southern although it seems to change a bit from year to year.) Row house food is also generally highly regarded, especially at BOB, Casa Italiana, and French House, but you’ll need to get invited by upperclassmen residents if you want to sample these.

@pittsburghscribe No I wasn’t, for a few reasons:

-I don’t like comparing myself to others as a general rule. As far as classes go, I never bothered worrying about any curves, and trusted that the grades would work themselves out in the end.

-Most people don’t brag about their previous accomplishments, especially after they learn during the first few weeks that that’s quite looked down upon. Maybe there are a few who never learn, but I wasn’t friends with any of them if there were–probably not a coincidence. You will hear your staff and upperclassmen tell you that it’s the norm to become friends with someone during frosh year and only learn much later during junior year that they did something amazing before college. The majority of my classmates were not just humble, but very down-to-earth. I wouldn’t be surprised if Montag Hall looked for that in applicants’ LORs and essays (but again, I couldn’t say for sure if they do).

-Stanford is not a school that admits applicants based solely on numerical measures and academic achievements. You certainly will have classmates with such achievements, but you’ll find that most people bring to the table the “unmeasurables.” If anyone doesn’t know what I mean by that, they’ll find out if they are admitted to and matriculate at Stanford. Living with these people for four years does nothing but enrich your life, and you should not be intimidated by them.

-It’s all about outlook and psychological framing. If you got the chance to attend the Society for Neuroscience conference in November, how would you feel about that? Are you excited to hear from the world’s experts in brain and nervous system research who are driving the leading edge of the field forward, and see the debut of some of the drugs and technologies that might eventually mature into the cures devastating neurological disorders within your lifetime? Or are you intimidated by all of the big names and smart people walking around you? Or, perhaps a more familiar example: When you’re looking at colleges to apply to, do you look at the number of Nobel laureates in Stanford’s faculty and feel intimidated, perhaps preferring to apply somewhere with fewer laureates? Or are you excited at the possibility to hear from them in lecture, work with them in lab, and get to know them on a personal level as their advisee?

So, having said that, I ask you: Would you be intimidated to be on the same campus as all of these awesome people with awesome life stories and awesome accomplishments, all of whom you will count as your peers? Or would you be unbelievably excited to have the chance to find among them your roommates, your best friends, and–for 20% of Stanford students, according to the Stanford Alumni Association–your eventual soulmate?

Some of the other Stanford students and alums should weigh in on this one. I suspect many will feel similarly. I know @kath00 was one of those 20% :slight_smile:

Thank you so much - that was so comprehensive! Sorry my question was kind of vague - I was just curious about whether the dorms were nice/comfortable. Also, do you know whether the group fitness pass is worth getting?

Group fitness pass? I thought all of the gym stuff was free to students :stuck_out_tongue: Maybe a current student should weigh in here if that’s changed.

The gym stuff is still free; the group fitness pass allows you to take fitness classes like yoga, bouldering, swimming etc.

http://cardinalrec.stanford.edu/wellness/group-fitness/

There’s a helpful YouTube series where the admissions director is interviewed by a high school ( I believe Buckley in LA) and he says some very useful things about how admissions decisions are made. If I find the link I’ll come back and post it.

Sorry to bump a sort of old thread OP but I had a question similar to mintish. Currently, in the Common App for Stanford, you can put in your “interests” in the application. I currently want to major in Product Design but I have literally no background in design because this major choice was a very very late realization :(. Do you think that has an impact on the admissions process if I put it as my #1 interest. I know you’re not an admission officer but as an alumni/interviewer, do you think it would have an impact?

@pittsburghscribe is right on the money. This is a very accurate description of Stanford. The invisibility of the “it” factor for each student confounds some people considering the school, but that is the cool thing about it.

@alee3519 With the ever present disclaimer that I have never served on an undergrad admissions subcommittee and that I can only make an educated guess based on my time at Stanford, I would think that putting PD as your #1 would neither hurt you nor help you.

For a hypothetical applicant who states they want to major in X, I’d suppose that it might help the admissions officers get a better feel for the applicant if that applicant did have a lot of relevant experience in that area. But it wouldn’t hurt them if they had zero experience, and most of the PD people I knew had little to no such experience before coming to Stanford.

That said, you might consider talking a bit about why PD to your interviewer, if you do get assigned one. It could also be appropriate to mention in one of the Stanford supplementary essays, depending on how important it is to you (“What matters to you and why?” essay), or if you see yourself spending a lot of time outside of class doing PD-related stuff (Roommate essay).

@Era991 Thank you so much for the great response! Unfortunately, I live in California so I won’t get an interviewer but I think I’ll try to sneak in a little bit about PD in my roommate essay. Again, thank you for the advice!