<p>panic I did read your whole post, and I got I understood it just fine, hence the “mostly” part. :] You addressed my point, I gave you that. You could have left it at that, but you went on an insulting tangent that was completely unrelated to my question, and now you’re just keeping them coming to make yourself seem like a bada**. Oooh, go you.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>lol So? What, does it make you feel better to know people on the Internet care about your opinions? And I don’t recall ever explicity saying my opinion on seating arrangements, other than sitting next to someone doesn’t bother me.</p>
<p>And like your comments aren’t inappropriate or a-hole ish. Freaking hypocrites.</p>
“[You] got [you] understood it just fine”? It sure didn’t seem that way when you claimed that I mostly missed something that I didn’t miss at all… but oh well. I guess I’ll just leave it at that because you obviously want me to so badly.</p>
<p>I’ll put it simply for you. I asked what the problem with sitting next to someone was. You said they can be annoying. A valid point. But then you went on about the benefits of sitting in the aisle, making an unnecessary insulting comment in the process. I didn’t ask about the benefits of sitting in the aisle or why people sit in the aisle, and you seem to think I did. I can read just fine, thanks, and even if I didn’t, it’s not that hard to deduce why people like the aisle.</p>
<p>That is how you more or less missed the purpose of my question, which I wouldn’t have had a problem with if you left out the insult and cocky attitude. Is it really that complicated? What part aren’t you getting?</p>
<p>lol Do you even know what a hypocrite is? And dude. You called me out on being a hypocrite on something I wasn’t even being a hypocrite about. I know where I was being a bit hypocritical, and I don’t know how you missed it, since you’re so desperate to call me out or whatever.</p>
<p>And if this is really that good to you, you need to get off the internet and go socialize with people that are in the same room as you. Because it really isn’t.</p>
Good. Admitting is the first step on the path to recovery.</p>
<p>
HAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
<p>You’re seriously lecturing me on spending time on the internet, of all things?! Wow, you are a hypocrite of epic proportions, aren’t you? Here you are, replying to me every 10 minutes for an entire hour, and yet you have the nerve to say that.</p>
<p>Awesome.</p>
<p>And by the way, good job on derailing this entire thread, which was originally about SITTING IN AISLE SEATS.</p>
<p>And shame on ME for trying to stay on topic, when instead, I should have just acquiesced and let you take over this thread willingly. I’m sure everyone appreciates you for it Pathetique, so thanks. You’re good at posting on message boards.</p>
<p>Huh. I don’t know what’s more idiotic. That you still take things out of context or you can’t understand a simple sentence. I never said there was anything wrong with farting around on the internet, but if you find something this dull to be so “good” you have problems, especially since you’re making half of it what’s “good” about it up.</p>
<p>My original post was on topic, too. It takes two to tango. Or hijack a thread.</p>
<p>But hey, keep replying in your attempt to appear witty or clever or funny or whatever it is you think you’re doing. I know how much the opinion of folks on the internet matters to you. :]</p>
<p>lol Yeah. Exactly what I said. You’re so good at quoting, care to quote where I said that? :)</p>
<p>So when every is saying in the thread they have a problem sitting next to people, and I ask why, that’s off topic? Right. Because if a post doesn’t just recite what the original said, it’s not on topic. Oh wait. Not.</p>
<p>I’d rather be a simpleton than whatever the hell you are. ;]</p>
<p>And I will fully admit this is an insanely pointless debate (and I should have just stopped replying to such trollish behavior a long time ago). Sorry for hijacking your thread Psycho. D: I liked the topic, too.</p>
<p>Yeah Psycho, I’m also sorry for assisting Pathetique in hijacking this thread. As you can tell by my first ON-TOPIC post, I did try to contribute my share.</p>
<p>I sit on the end because a. i’m lefthanded, and writing in a seat made for someone who’s right-handed is extremely annoying, and b. most of the people that tend to talk a lot sit in the middle of the rows in the back, so sitting on the end reduces any potential distraction.</p>
<p>^ Ugh I hate how so many classrooms don’t have lefty desks! I took a midterm a couple days ago where there were literally no lefty desks (in a room with at least 100 desks). So I kind of turned in my seat so I could write on the right-hand side, and the TA thought I was cheating off the person next to me. </p>
<p>i like the classrooms where there’s simply a table and people sit around it, it’s more personal and there’s plenty of desk room.</p>
<p>and I always spring for the aisle seats, mostly because my lectures at at 8am and I’ve had embarrassing moments where I wake up practically drooling on some poor person’s shoulder =/</p>
<p>There are three instances in which I hate sitting next to someone… If either I or the person I’m sitting next to is sick/coughing/sneezing; If the person next to me smells; And finally, if I set my stuff down before class and notice a girl and then leave the room and come back to my spot and see the girl seated next to my stuff. It’s cute at first but then when the girl is too shy to say anything, it just becomes incredibly awkward and it’s just as awkward two months later whenever I exchange glances with the girls in class.</p>
It takes two to tango. Or hijack a thread.</p>