<p>Interesting (and somewhat entertaining) discussion back and forth between mikemac and OlympicLady and the value of attending a CC then going on to a UC. </p>
<p>I do agree that going to SBCC can incur a significant cost without really needing to. One of the main attractions of going to a CC first is the lower cost for living at home. </p>
<p>However, addressing the question as to whether a CC is a viable way into a 4-year school, I like to deal with numbers. A report is published that has all kinds of numbers to it. It is the “Accountability Reporting for the California Community Colleges” (<a href=“http://www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/TRIS/research/ARCC/ARCC%202010,%20March%202010.pdf[/url]”>http://www.cccco.edu/Portals/4/TRIS/research/ARCC/ARCC%202010,%20March%202010.pdf</a>).</p>
<p>The percentage of CSU graduates that attended a CC first is in the mid 50 percent for the period shown in the report, which was from 2003 to 2009 (Table 2). The percentage of UC grads that attended a CC first was slightly less than 30 precent for the same time period (Table 3). You can look up specific CC rates within the report.</p>
<p>Looking at the flip side, how many went to a CC with the intent of going to a 4-year school? Well, Table 9 shows the percentage of first-time students with a minimum of 12 units earned who attempted transfer-level Math or English during enrollment who transferred to a Baccalaureate granting institution within six years and it stays constant, within the time period, at about 40 percent. This percentage would cover the CSUs and UC as well as other 4-year schools, both in-sate and out-of-state. Many more students might be going to a CC, some just for fun, some don’t make it to these classes before they drop out.</p>
<p>So, IMHO, it looks to me that you’re both right to a point. If you “just missed” getting into the UC of your choice, then a CC may be the way to go. You’d have to prove yourself at the CC. That’s the rub, if you were a slacker in high school (and more than “just missed” getting into a UC), what is going to make you change at a CC? I’m sure some will change, but the numbers seem to say that a lot won’t. Still, a lot of students, do go the CC route and do well.</p>
<p>On another of the discussion topics as to whether it makes a difference going all 44 years at a UC or splitting the time between a CC and a UC: As a former hiring manager, in engineering, at a large aerospace firm, I was only looking at a person’s upper division classes in the specific areas that the job would be in. I also didn’t care if you got a “C” in music appreciation or not. The upper division math and engineering classes were what I was looking at and I would calculate my own GPA based on just the classes that were relevant to the job. I would use my own GPA calculation to help evaluate the job candidate. (I would also be looking at one’s communication skills, both written and oral as you don’t work in a vacuum. You very much need to be able to communicate.) So, attending a CC first and then a UC wouldn’t matter to me very much. PS. Which college the final degree did come from was a factor, a graduate from MIT or CalTech was held in much higher regard than one from just down the street at “Joe’s school of engineering and brain surgery”.</p>