Bad ECs

<p>Hey, a few of my friends, who apparently are too lazy to register at CC, have asked me to post their stats and chance evals. So, if you don't mind the long post, I'll do it for 3 of my friends. What all three are concerned about is their lack of committment to extracurriculars and no real hooks. They do, as I'll admit, have amazingly high stats. </p>

<p>James:Colleges: Williams (top choice), the ivies, Swarthmore
GPA 4.5
New SAT: CR. 780, Math 800, Wr 700
SAT II: Bio 800, US history 800, Math IIC 800
APs: World History 5
Awards:
National Merit Commended
RPI Computing Medal </p>

<p>EC's:
Science Olympiads: Junior Year (1 year, just joined)
Varsity Volleyball Junior year (1 year, just joined).
Spent summer of freshmen year doing camp counseling</p>

<p>Taylor: Colleges: RPI, Cal Tech, MIT, Cornell
GPA: 4.2
New SAT: CR 700, M 760, Wr 690
SAT II: IIC 800, US 800, Physics 780
APs: World History 5
Awards:
not that I know of</p>

<p>ECs:
Science Olympiads: 10th grade went to states bronze, 11th grade went to states silver, vice president.
Spent 2 weeks at RPI summer of sophomore year taking a class</p>

<p>Kyle: Colleges: All the ivies, MIT, Cal Tech
GPA: 4.5
New SAT: 800M, 750Cr, 700 Wr
SATII: World History 760, IIC 800, Chemistry 79
Awards:
Dartmouth Book Award
National Merit Semifinalist</p>

<p>Ecs:
Chem Demos club member
Boy Scouts troop leader (no idea really)
Spending this summer taking a computer class at RPI</p>

<p>just have them make their own profiles, if they care enough, they will.</p>

<p>However, I glanced it over and they all look fine. ECs arent their strength, but they all have something they're committed to thats a significant activity. They have great stats otherwise which makes it ok. Maybe the hyper competitive schools like Harvard will want more but for most other tip-top schools they look allright.</p>