<p>Hi Firandrain.</p>
<p>Regarding the “rate my interviewer”, I am not saying that other schools have. On the other hand, many other schools of the same caliber as Brown do not necessarily require an interview.</p>
<p>As you said, if the interviewer writes a bad evaluation, this will not determine a rejection outcome. Well, this may be assuaging for the “super star” applicant, but for the “normal” applicant who is competing for a spot, any negative element may be the last drop in the bucket. So there may be out there two equally “normal” applicants, one who ends up rejected because of an hostile interview, and another accepted because of a nice interview.</p>
<p>I agree with you that Brown offers very good interview experiences to many students. However, if the quality control of the interviews is not strong enough to provide a (near) uniform experience to all applicants, or at least a minimum level of interview quality so that the applicant does not feel that his/her chances are ruined and I better look elsewhere, then Brown loses by not fixing this.</p>
<p>Notice that the applicant I mentioned knows that this happened once… Bad luck… Mooving on… For Brown, however, the existance of “high variance” interviews will be repeated year over year, and who knows how many less-than-positive impressions on applicants this will imprint.</p>