<p>We visited Vassar and Bard on the same day, but in summer so, for what it's worth... Our experience at Vassar was much more positive than robyrm's: adcom was young, funny, reassuring; student guide was a music major and, for a tour guide, pretty 'regular' and not particularly articulate. At one point, I stepped off the tour to chat with a couple of students, both of whom said they "loved" Vassar, could not imagine being anywhere else, had liked Haverford, Swarthmore--I forget where else--but were sold on the fellow students, beauty, and "vibe" of Vassar. </p>
<p>By contrast, adcom at Bard (an alumna) seemed rooted in the 60s, tour guide there was most impressive, articulate, and admirably candid about limitations of housing options, meal plan, location, while praising its unique curriculum--the intensive summer workshop for entering first-years, sophomore self-assessment, and senior project--interaction with faculty, and dynamic leadership. Especially for a confident or self-directed student, perhaps, Bard sounded wonderful; Vassar seemed both flexible (very few requirements) and traditional, which our d preferred.</p>
<p>Concur with robyrm's observations about the two campuses. Bard had a sort of wood-chippy, slightly scruffy feel that fit its setting but also the dramatic Gehry arts building. (We couldn't talk our way past security to see the inside of it that day.) Bard seemed very much 'unto itself,' or as d said, "There's no street here!" By contrast, Vassar buildings and grounds had a more traditional college campus feel, and its facilities and resources were truly impressive, particularly the library. </p>
<p>Bottom line: Our d came away feeling that she 'should' like Bard more than she did and wanting to set up an overnight when Vassar was in session.</p>