<p>mm…im using 11th. Think it will make a difference?</p>
<p>got a 55/95 on last test.</p>
<p>I think 55/95 Barrons is a solid 750+ on real thing.</p>
<p>I’m using the 2007 edition…</p>
<p>yeah, a 55 in barrons should definitely get you a 750+ on the real thing…some of the barrons questions are just plain ridiculous…</p>
<p>Lets hope so. Hope we have a easy test on Saturday.</p>
<p>official practice test- 740.
Hope to get above 750</p>
<p>In my experience Barron’s tends to give harder questions than actually found on the test.</p>
<p>Yep, I took another one a got a 760. Still less than perfect though..</p>
<p>Yea. Every time I use a Barrons book, the practice tests turn out to be MUCH harder than the real tests.</p>
<p>Real test was…not bad</p>
<p>real test was harder than barrons. barrons was cake. real test was stone</p>
<p>^the real test (May 08)…was so freaking easy…seriously!</p>
<p>I got a 800- this is to show all of you that the barrons tests are death compared to real thing</p>
<p>The barrons tests are ridiculous. There are a series of questions which make you identify a plethora of nations in central and south America (Nicaragua, Panama etc) on a map, which i doubt CB would actually test.</p>
<p>I got about 60 right and about 25 wrong on on diagnostic and now I am a bit scared of the saturday test.</p>
<p>I am pretty certain that the Barron’s USH SAT II book is way harder than the test. My friend told me it had a lot of stuff not on the real test, and that AMSCO was probably a better study guide.</p>