<p>So for the last week I've been taking Barron's math IIc practice tests and getting -15 to -10 on them. I started freaking out and thinking I was going to get like 700 on the actual test ( I got 800 on SAT math). But, then I just took Test 1 from another book, called math success, by thompson peterson and I got -1. Which one is more accurate? Is it somewhere in the middle? Because I really want an 800 and need to know if I should still study for Math IIc or other stuff instead.</p>
<p>bump........</p>
<p>barrons is harder than the real one. if your missing only 10 - 15 ur set for an 800 on saturday</p>
<p>agreed....</p>
<p>^ I def. agree. I missed like 6ish on the barron's tests each time. Yet I took a real Math IIC test (collegeboard's blue Real SATII book) and got -1, a very very solid 800. I wanted to sleep early, so I just did the test, didn't double check, and finished in exactly 30 min, too. So...yeah, the barron's is OUT OF PROPORTIONALLY harder, in my opinion. It teaches many useless stuff too...
But, if you're confident w/ Barrons's math IIC tests, kudos to you. You WILL do well.</p>