<p>I've been confused by a number of the vocab-in-context questions in the first two BB practice tests. Can anyone offer explanations for the following?</p>
<p>p. 420 #10 why E and not C</p>
<p>p. 469 #17 why D and not A</p>
<p>p. 485 #17 why D and not C</p>
<p>I also have a couple other CR question from practice test 2:</p>
<p>p. 485 #12 - I chose B because the author basically takes one example and supposedly proves his point with that alone. I don't see anything in the passage hinting at a "too literal" interpretation. Also, wouldn't C also be a plausible response?</p>
<p>p. 485 #14 - I chose A. While he clearly looks down on the theories' proponents, the author never seems to express anything as strong as choice E in the paragraphs devoted to responding to the theories. On the other hand, he does seem to offer contrary evidence in that he presents logical arguments. Or do arguments not count as "evidence"?</p>
<p>p. 466 #7 - Not sure why D is correct. The info in passage one could be used to discourage romanticization, but it doesn't mention it at all - doesn't the evidence have to be in the passage?</p>
<p>Thanks to anyone who takes the time to help.</p>