<p>randomguy: Excellent response. I personally agree that g is not a perfect explanation, and the reality is (as always) somewhere in the middle. However, my point was to say that you should've written that kind of thing before. It's reasonable, logical, and open-minded. (I feel) that's the type of discourse we should be striving for.</p>
<p>In any case, I actually like the sequences questions. They require pattern recognition, which is a pretty fundamental and very important analysis skill.</p>