<p>Just do the summer reading (the Iliad, Plato's Euthyphro, and sections from Herodotus' History). I came in never having read anything remotely resembling philosophy, let alone writing 5 page essays about it, and I had pretty much no exposure to the History and Politics curriculum either. I knew a little bit about Literature, having read perhaps 2 or 3 of the texts before, but the essays weren't really the type of thing you get in AP, so I was still pretty much in the dark.</p>
<p>And I still did fine! If you have to, get a start on more of the Plato - read some background on him and maybe start on The Republic. Also, when the H&P list is out, get going on the rest of Herodotus, but don't start the Thucydides yet. You also might feel free to venture on to the Odyssey. But don't get too far ahead of yourself - a lot of the learning comes from comparing and contrasting the texts you've read, which is harder to do if you haven't had class discussions on the previous texts yet.</p>
<p>Other than that, do all the real leisure reading you can, or really anything that isn't on the DS curriculum, because you will absolutely not have time once the year starts. Don't worry abou 1500 pages a week though. That's a very inflated figure. Even the worst weeks I remember didn't total more than 800 pages, and that was largely due to the Lit reading being half of Don Quixote or half of War and Peace. And large, large numbers of DS students didn't finish (or sometimes even start) one or both of those huge texts. Probably the worst part reading-wise was having 1400 pages or so that you feel you should read over Christmas and spring breaks. Don't worry about the essays so much, there's little you can do to prepare in my book. You may get into the swing of doing them well and in a timely manner, or you might just keep putting them off later and later each week until you start one at 3 am the morning it's due like I did. Either way can work.</p>
<p>Olive Tree - What is interesting to me, and this goes for all the people asking similar question, is that there is this assumption floating in the background that your curriculum should be practical in helping you advance career goals or graduate school admissions. This kind of assumed pragmatism is a hallmark of modern American education, and it is exactly the type of thing that a program like DS is supposed to combat, IMO. Here you all are, asking what use DS is, presupposing a view about what education is and what it is meant for, before having the background to adequately do so. Ultimately, this is what DS is should provide - a better way to decide and understand what the good life is, what your goals in life (and career) should be, and what the purpose of education is. DS is about learning to ask and contemplate various answer to the big questions in life. Asking whether it is "useful" to such and such end is simply to assume that you already know both the right questions AND the answers.</p>
<p>So not to be too snarky, but to even know if "is it useful to X end?" is the right question, you'd already have to have the strong education in the Western Canon that DS provides.</p>
<p>And I say this only because I used to think similarly, and DS was instrumental in changing that.</p>