<p>Here is my situation:</p>
<p>I DONT want to go to grad school after completing my undergrad... Hell, I may never seek a higher degree. I want to land a sweet internship before entering my senior year, and a sweet job after graduating. (Sweet can be interpreted in many ways, but I hope for something related to my major that presents me with interesting work and pays well). </p>
<p>At this point, I am extremely torn between Berkeley and Davis. I adore both schools, but for different reasons. Neither school is 'perfect' for me. </p>
<p>Davis Pros:
-Environment. I am a naturally quiet and hardworking person, and thus I really appreciate Davis' quiet and studious atmosphere (i.e. lots of great study areas).
-Happy Students. It seems like this University puts a lot of emphasis on supporting its students (CoHo, arcade/bowlingalley, ridiculously awesome double decker buses).
-Probably a more manageable course load so I can enjoy my last two years of college while earning decent grades. </p>
<p>Davis Cons:
-Not particularly strong in my major. Their Econ department is respectable (top 40), but clearly not in the same league as Cal's program.
-Underwhelming recruiting in Econ. They have some big players such as BIG4 Accounting, but it seems like they are passed up by the larger banks and finance/investing firms.
-Limited scope of Econ classes offered. </p>
<p>Berkeley Pros:
-Overall campus prestige (wow factor when you tell someone you attend Cal)
-The Econ department is top notch and I can take a class or two through HAAS (ability to enroll in classes that are more aligned with my career interests).
-Every company recruits here...
-Competitive and intellectual atmosphere will drive me to achieve more</p>
<p>Berkeley Cons:
-The city surrounding campus sucks balls.
-Difficulty. I hear horror stories about how hard the curriculum is
-Lack of student resources on campus. It seems like they don't put a lot of their budget in making their students happy (recreational facility, for example).
-Campus was not as inviting</p>
<p>Big difference: Quarter vs. Semester. I have been on the quarter schedule for the last two years, and I can't say that I loved it. Most professors either run out of time, or intentionally skip ~half of the chapter consistently because the book covers more material than the 10 week period will allow. Maybe on a semester system, the students are able to delve deeper into the material and learn more as a result? Any opinions?</p>
<p>Anyone else dealing with this decision, (or something similar)?</p>