<p>For the 2010 survey it was 3%. But it was higher for other years.
<a href=“https://career.berkeley.edu/Major2010/ChemEngr.stm”>https://career.berkeley.edu/Major2010/ChemEngr.stm</a></p>
<p>I would like to know the exact methodology for these surveys. Perhaps that would help reveal disparities between the two schools.</p>
<p>Blah, I didn’t say JHU forces its students to respond to the surveys - you’re the one who said that. What I said is that, JHU, being a private institution, is very much dependent on the students tuition fees. It is therefore highly likely that the school will do all it can just to attract students. After all, it’s still a business. </p>
<p>Berkeley. Personal IMHO</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>That further exposes Blah2009’s inability to analyze data. </p>
<p>Both Berkley or JHU are excellent schools and I do not think you could go wrong with either. Consider which campus, location and vibe feel right for you. If you are happy and do well you should be able to find employment with a Chem e degree from either. Best of luck. </p>
<p>Yes, RML. >30% unemployment for the past 2 years shows an inability to “analyze” (aka read) data. You are grasping at straws here.</p>
<p>“Blah, I didn’t say JHU forces its students to respond to the surveys - you’re the one who said that. What I said is that, JHU, being a private institution, is very much dependent on the students tuition fees.”</p>
<p>LOL - right. As much as Berkeley depends on out of state students? doubtful. </p>
<p>“It is therefore highly likely that the school will do all it can just to attract students. After all, it’s still a business.”"</p>
<p>I guess Hopkins is the only school that does this. Yup. Just Hopkins. Berkeley must do everything it can to dissuade students from applying. Your run down buildings are doing just that.</p>
<p>Berkeley can rest assured you don’t have a law diploma - or any diploma for that matter.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Actually it isn’t. If JHU really needed it, I imagine Bloomberg wouldn’t hesitate give them a sizeable endowment. He’s already donated over a billion dollars to the university…</p>
<p>
Surely, the fees generated from OOS and Int’l students tuition fees would help Berkeley a lot, but Berkeley will just be fine if it generates only half of the amount it generates from those students now. Besides, the intention to increase the OOS & Int’l Students is capped at 20%. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>lol… Don’t say that, Blah. You’ve already proven yourself having poor reading and understanding skills, just like how you messed up the numbers. I’d refrain from posting snide remarks if I can’t interpret data, in the first place. </p>
<p>Again, that’s 30% based on the number of respondents, not on the total number of ChemE grads. </p>
<p>"You’ve already proven yourself having poor reading and understanding skills, just like how you messed up the numbers. "</p>
<p>I want you to read that out loud to yourself and see if it makes sense . That’s atrocious writing, just as your logic has been atrocious in this thread. Out of the 40-50% of respondents that responded to the survey (the unemployment has consistently been above 20%) except for one year out of the over 5 surveyed. You may assume the majority of the rest who did not respond are gainfully employed or that those who have responded with unemployment are taking vacations (wow, must be an awesome vacation without a job in hand), but the opposite may be true as well. That is, the non-respondents might be unemployed as well. </p>