Best 5 U.S. presidents

<p>no, its the fact that you cannot support your arguments</p>

<p>Descartes himself could not follow your line of thought</p>

<p>then why dont YOU shut up? (takingbacksunday)</p>

<p>Let's all grow up children. It's both pointless and stupid to fight online.</p>

<p>Are back to the US again? I a,m still waiting for those pictures...</p>

<p>uhhh what do u mean descartes himself couldnt follow my arguments??? I hardly consider gay marriage something with concrete facts! please "enlighten" me with my own stupidity.</p>

<p>Read your posts on this thread. It makes no sense at all. :)</p>

<p>what? the thing about Bush maybe getting the nobel peace prize? LOL i hardly consider that nonsense...if i had a choice Id give it to him myself LOL.</p>

<p>me?.....AP Gov??? son I'm in college...i've read 4 entire political science textbooks, gone through various findings of political scientists, read many books on the subject, gone through various sociology and anthropology courses, studied the Constitution and it's various interpretations, I keep up with current affairs, I actually know what goes on in Congress......so to tell me i'm basing my arguments on one semester of AP government is absurd....whatta tool</p>

<p>why don't you look up the whole Bush and Blair getting nominated for a Nobel Prize....numerous critics and journalists have said they have NO chance at winning it....actually...they ddin't win it :)....cuz it was for 2001....what the hell would he get the prize for? tell me this....he's not a distinguished scholar, scientist, diplomat, peacekeeper, etc.</p>

<p>if i had a choice Id give it to him myself LOL.</p>

<p>The Nobel Prize is very prestiogious because idiots like you dont hand then. lol</p>

<p>no sorry its for 2004.
<a href="http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/mar/03nobel.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.rediff.com/news/2004/mar/03nobel.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>but the point is..he was still nominated and considering there is only a limited number of ppl nominated its a great honor. Obviously as primitive said the ppl arent idiots...but yet they nominated Bush hmmmmmmmmm?</p>

<p>yeah...2004 has come and gone.....notice Bush was nominated in 2001 as well, but nobody knew, because he had no realistic chance.....he had an even worse chance for 2004.....furthermore...it's not even for 2004....that was for the 2003 Nobel Prize...what an idiot!</p>

<p>ummm....prominent figures that commit acts of controversy usually do get nominated...but they rarely ever win..</p>

<p>ok then provide evidence for that...i think it would be safe to say the new pope has not done anything controversial!</p>

<p>not everyone that's nominated has done something controversial.....some ppl actually do something for the benefit of mankind...those are the ones that usually win...</p>

<p>and John Paul II isn't the new pope...</p>

<p>If you didnt know, Bush was just NOMINATED. The winner was Shirin Ebadi.</p>

<p>From the source, others nominated were Blair, Chirac, the Pope and others, totalling 194 candidates. So Bush had no chance in hell!!</p>

<p>And to all conservatives, Jimmy Carter won the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize !!
And Kim Dae Jung won the Prize in 2000. :)</p>

<p>furthermore....religous figures usually do err on the side of controversy :)</p>

<p>Jimmy Carter got that for his book....he sucked as a President</p>

<p>"but the point is..he was still nominated and considering there is only a limited number of ppl nominated its a great honor. Obviously as primitive said the ppl arent idiots...but yet they nominated Bush hmmmmmmmmm?"</p>

<p>"If you didnt know, Bush was just NOMINATED. The winner was Shirin Ebadi."</p>

<p>read my above statement primitive...</p>

<p>Bush...for a peace prize.....that's a worse oxymoron than Microsoft Works</p>

<p>Since when do we use the Nobel Peace Prize to measure a President's worth? There are billions of people in this world who live their everday life in a way that benefits mankind, but they don't receive a Peace Prize now do they? The Peace Prize is determined by a subjective voting process, thus it is influenced by the whims of the voters.</p>