<p>Brown... the WHOLE thing was a fake, thats why it's funny. Follow the links, or google it for the original spoof article.</p>
<p>BCC is right, the hotness of women can be related to academics. For example, in physics, the acceleration of a falling object on earth in a vaccuum is independent of its mass. However, this is an ideal situation, so it does not take into account air resistance, which applies the force of friction. It is obvious that fat unnattractive girls would have a higher coefficient of friction when falling, and thus would have less accelleration. It goes without saying that skinny girls would then be more accelerated. </p>
<p>This is where the Chemistry starts.
Now you need to apply some thermodynamics. As the vibration of a particle is accelerated, it becomes hot. So, seeing as the attractive girls are more accellerated, they are clearly more hot. Also, it is important to note that sex with these women is enthalpically and entropically favored, meaning it will happen, however, there is a factor of probability here. For one molocule to interact with another in a spontaneous reaction, they must interact with the correct molocule in a specific way. This is why nerds don't get laid, because they are not the correct molocule for interaction, and when there is an interaction with a correct molocule, it is often times completely random. </p>
<p>This is where the second law of thermodynamics comes in. It states that entropy is always increasing, which means that the universe is constantly becoming more disordered. Therefore, the conclusion that we must come to is that hot women cause all of the chaos in the universe. </p>
<p>Basically it's kind of like Pandora's box, but I won't go there. (mostly cuz last time I was there it smelled like a dead fish)</p>
<p>Yeah, RC251 gave the right link to the site. People should check it out. It also has grades for...</p>
<p>Academics
Athletics
Campus Dining
Campus Housing
Campus Strictness
Computers
Diversity
Drug Scene
Facilities
Greek Life
Local Atmosphere
Nightlife
Off-Campus Housing
Off-Campus Dining
Parking
Safety & Security
Transportantion
Weather
and um, if any you guys care about it...guys ratings as well</p>
<p>KingJames23, and RC251, thanks for the link. Good stuff. Letter grades are nice, but anyone have any "specifics" they would like to offer about the UC's (UCB, UCLA, UCD, UCSD)?</p>
<p>According to King James' list, the ugliest schools are the ones with the higher percentage of Asians.</p>
<p>Or is it just because they're mostly so smart?</p>
<p>packrbackr, that post was absolutely hilarious.</p>
<p>Agreed with above poster.</p>
<p>Yes yes, thank god for advanced general chemistry. The world has been explained to me in a new light.</p>
<p>Well, I think packrbackr has pretty much said it all. However, just for the sake of providing some visual enhancements, I decided that the inverse relation of hotness/academics would be best depicted by the Phillip's Curve.</p>
<p>This theory tends to hold true to both genders. However, there a few exceptions (me, moi, and myself), represented by a supply shock on the curve (1 to 2).</p>
<p>it's rather silly to base a majorities general appearance upon something so trivial as to where they attend college. however, i do find the list rather captivating, or at least good for a nice laugh. ; )</p>
<p>1) DO NOT choose your college based solely on "how hot the girls are," you will really be letting yourself down in the long run.</p>
<p>2) Attractiveness and weight are not necessarily correlated. There are plenty of skinny girls are not particularly attractive and there are plenty of heavier girls who are.</p>
<p>3) Look past the glasses, don't focus on her sloppy sweatpants and flip flops, stop comparing her to the girl sitting next to her, all people are beautiful if viewed the right way. So see the best in everyone. :)</p>
<p>Oh, and some of the schools on this are definitely ranked wrong.</p>
<p>nerdgirl, I don't think any of us are taking the rankings seriously. They are pretty funny though. =D</p>
<p>Haha, true :]</p>
<p>I would hope no one would base it off of something so trivial. Then again I do know some boys who actually ARE basing their college selection off of the ladies there... I kinda feel guilty laughing about it. :D</p>
<p>yeah but the look on their faces when they realise the mistake they made will be priceless..</p>
<p>well nerdgirl you got one thing right, weight and height are not NECESARILY correlated. There are plenty of hideous skinny girls and gross anorexic girls, but there is one correlation that always proves to be true. Fat girls arent hot. I dont mean a little pudgy i mean FAT.</p>
<p>tisk tisk tisk, if only I'd seen a discussion about this before i chose my college.</p>
<p>My sister goes to St. Olaf, and she started a facebook group called "I'm Too Pretty to Go to Carleton" ... hehe, those schools are pretty competitive with each other since they're both in the not-so-enormous town of Northfield, MN.</p>
<p>HAHA Carleton sucks I would never go to that school ever, and not just because of the ugly hairy armpit women. I would rather die then go there for one semester. St. Olaf is a really cool college though, I really loved it there and probly would have gone there too if I didn't want to be an engineer. Of course no little private school good at that or even has a program, so I only visited those two cuz they were close to home and I went with friends, but Carleton really blew. And the women were ugly, probably uglier than their campus.</p>
<p>And St. Olaf beat them this year in football. </p>
<p>And did I mention that Carleton women are ugly?</p>
<p>Okay that above post was without looking at the list, I just looked and Carleton got a D+ (LMAO) so my suspicions have been proved correct by the masses. Thank God for mass generalizations. (And UW-Madison)</p>
<p>Where do the schools rank as far as hot guys go?</p>