<p>
Sure . . .</p>
<p>
That was exactly my point with the Clevo - ~$1,500 computer + $150 montior = $1,650 just to really experience what the Clevo is trying to offer you in 1080 HD, ever increasingly widening the gap in cost between comparable models.</p>
<p>
In case it wasn’t clear, that 45fps was an example to my point. Anyway, laptop GPUs don’t play many games on an ultra setting with 30+fps. In fact, even the 670M only plays about 40% of current games over that number. Really, I don’t think that with most games there will be a huge difference in fps between the two cards. Not enough to consider one outdated sooner than the other. Of course, there may come a specific game every once in a while with insane graphics outputs that may show something like that and the lower-end card will lag behind at higher settings, but those games are few and far between - which would bring my to my point that when choosing which dedicated GPU to get (and ultimately which laptop they come in) it may depend on the specific consumer and which specific games they anticipate to play. Are they the type that needs to have every game on PC with the best graphics display, or are they the type that is satisfied with enough raw power to still play most games great and others decently? And with the Clevo + monitor pitch of ~$1,700 it may become more beneficial to get a desktop.</p>