<p>
</p>
<p>And that would be wrong! Also, there is no reason to want to introduce a vague concept such as a “general” LAC, and whatever that might mean. </p>
<p>The OP asked about the “better” program and the one with the best success in obtaining a terminal degree. </p>
<p>There are very few times when clear distinctions can be made, and this is one of those cases. When looking for a comparison to Mudd’s math program, one looks a bit to the West and Pasadena. Williams does have a very strong program but it is more comparable to programs at Pomona, Bowdoin, Swarthmore, Carleton, and even Wesleyan, Haverford, and St. Olaf. </p>
<p>Fwiw, between Mudd (that is the clear leader in this field) and Williams, you probably should place Reed, especially when looking at the PhD Production. </p>
<p>This said, the biggest decision should be about flying from one coast to the other for 8 to 12 times. By the way, once in California, the travel from one of the airports in really not that bad. Frankly, if one considers that the Claremont colleges are difficult to reach, most LACs should be not be considered. In addition, having several airports within ONE hour of travel is a great luxury to have.</p>
<p>In the end, it would require a sacrifice to attend the best program.</p>