<p>Hey all, I posted this in Science Majors and got nothing, so I figured I'd try here. It is going to be long!!
I am a Bio major at Indiana University, graduating in August/May 2014. I'm interested in pursuing a career in conservation/ecology/botany/widlife bio, and going to grad school in a few years. I started as a Bio BS, but Ochem 2 and Phys have taken their toll on me and I'm trying to decide whether to switch to a BA or not. Since I started as a BS, I have taken MANY upper level bio lects/labs- about 4 of each, all of which are relevant to my field of interests. I also am doing an Animal Behavior minor and have worked in 3 labs- 1 was a paid lab assistant job where I did perform molecular procedures, 1 is an unpaid research assistant volunteer/internship position, and 1 is a paid internship position. One of my questions is, of these, would any count as "research" experience?
Also, most of the grad students in my lab have advised me that a BS is not necessary. And most of the internships/ grad programs I've looked at never specified a BS is necessary- just all the classes they recommend. (All of which I have taken or are taking in the spring)
My gpa is about a 2.84, and my major gpa is a little lower. I'm thinking about switching to the BA to boost my gpa to higher than a 3, since I feel like that is more important right now than continuing with Ochem lab and phys 2. If i did continue with the BS, my gpa would surely decrease, and so would my quality of life haha. Basically, my question is this: in today's competitive market, would it be better to end up with a BS in Bio and a sub 3.0 gpa, or a BA with most of the BS required classes and a 3.0+ gpa? I'm really leaning towards the BA just to graduate on time and have a better quality of life! haha. I REALLY REALLY appreciate any responses and input!!</p>
<p>tl;dr: Bio BS with a 2.9 GPA or a Bio BA with lots of extra upper level bio classes and a 3.0+ gpa? I have lab + researchish experience!
Again, I really appreciate any and all help!! Thanks!</p>