<p>Remember, the curve changes with every test, but this is your best estimate. Please no more posts asking what your score is if you missed a certain amount.</p>
<p>Not neccesarily; I'm just perturbed. If I were to get a 5 on my Bio AP and a ____ score on the SAT II, do you think colleges would overlook the SAT II? Well, I think the test focused more on genetics than the practices I've seen. Every book constantly kept reiterating "30% organismal biology." Either way, I'm sure things will work out.</p>
<p>What I've been hearing, AP and SAT IIs do not really matter that much to college admissions. However I have heard that SAT IIs are looked at more than APs because they show greater score accuracy and range. However, most colleges, including Ivys, say that as long as you have 4s and 5s and above 700 on your SAT II you should be fine. What they really look at is the SAT I and the ACT. How did you do on those?</p>
<p>Be sure to do well on it. Most colleges require SAT II scores just to standardize an academic class. They only have slight clues as to how hard one school's Biology class is compared to another and what constitutes an A in each. If you score above a 650+ you demonstrate proficiency, 700+ is excellence.</p>
<p>amnesia...one more wrong on the ecology can make a difference and become two. for example, pretend i got six wrongs and no blanks on the molecular. this would subtract 7 points off my score (6+(.25<em>6)) and I would get a 790. But if I took the ecology and got seven wrongs, this would subtract nine points (7+(.25</em>7)). Does that mean I can get a 71 on the ecology and still get an 790 or a 780?</p>
<p>Where in the Real SAT II book does this curve come from? I've looked in the book I bought this year. It only had an explanation of the test, an abbreviated test (only 40 questions), and a list of correct answers. They didn't give a scale for either the M or E test. Can anyone clarify this?</p>
<p>Biology was harder than i expected. I agree with all of you. It was ridiculous. It was so much genetics. There were no plants, not even organs in human physiology! It was insane. </p>
<p>History....well the AP was slightly harder than the SAT II, but some questions on the SAT II were so...indirect and vague and the wording was so open to interpretation (if you check out the other threads on history, people, including myself, are really arguing harshly about various questions). I hope the curve is high because we deserve that. </p>
<p>And the SAT II is much more important than the AP.</p>
<p>YES...i actually got stumped on some of those 4-8.....like the chromatid question....i actually got confused! wow....wait....wat do u mean u werent challenged??? cus if u mean in class...neither was i!!! my class sucked, we didnt do anything, i am obligated to study myself...the whole course...by myself...</p>
<p>no, i didn't find the test challening. i omitted two... and probably got one or two wrong.</p>
<p>my class was hard, but i read the entire 50 chapters, so that is why... my teacher sucks balls...little *****. tells us all of her problems... what a fag.</p>
<p>the chromatid question? i think i put 16. i don't know... a haploid of 4.</p>
<p>so that makes an organism a diploid of 8... with 8 x 2 chromatids... 16.</p>