bio sat 2

<p>is a 660 a HORRIBLE score?</p>

<p>..... to whose standards?... 660 is fine to me</p>

<p>well i got 730 math ic
and 1380 on sats with a 690 in writing
is that score consistent with these? or is it outta place</p>

<p>witha 2070 (i think), 730 mIIc.. a 660 is not horribly out of place. the admissions officers know that the only difference between a 660 and 700 is roughly 4 questions.. a 660 wont kill you</p>

<p>well im definatly retaking something in dec...what do you suggest i do...bio or sat1</p>

<p>well..depends which one you feel like you can improve more on. if you feel like you can improve 100-200+ on sat1..go take that..if you feel like 2070 is pretty solid for you, then take the sat bio..or maybe another subject test (if its needed)</p>

<p>i got 620 on june and this time i got 780.. i studied for 3 days.. i really learned a lesson this time.. concentration is the biggest factor haha</p>

<p>its just that i feel like any increase is great on sat1 because its so important but bio even if i do get 700...no one will REALLY care that much...so i guess i have 2 weeks to decide</p>

<p>I got a 790 math iic and a 640 math ic. The know this is a gross inequity, but will colleges care that much? (they will see all my scores)</p>