<p>Hi, I'm about to take the Bio SAT Subject test in June.
I heard from my classmates (in AP Bio) who took it in May that the E was definitely easier than the M section - Some took M, some took E, both looked at the other section.</p>
<p>I was wondering if Colleges judge E or M differently. Like, Do they think it's better to do well on M than it is to do well on E?</p>
<p>does anyone know what plant hormones are on the bio sat II</p>
<p>I don’t think it makes much of a difference to the college, but if you can handle Molecular, than take it cause it will probably be more impressive, even if just to a tiny extent.</p>
<p>colleges dont care but take molecular (not b/c itll be more impressive) but ITS EASIER TO GET A HIGHER SCORE… like you might get more wrong but the curve for m is just so much better. definitely take molecular unless of course, your school only teaches ecology or something (not likely…)</p>
<p>I am also unsure of which one to take :(</p>
<p>Well, I’m in the AP course.
I suppose my school does focus more on the molecular. We spent a week on Ecology at the beginning of the year, but that’s it.</p>
<p>I guess I’ll take the M, but the Labs are so hard!</p>
<p>Same I’m from AP and we spend way more time on M so I’ll probably take that.
Is the curve that much better on M compared to E?</p>
<p>Anyways I’m sure on the AP exam I’m getting a 5 or a 4. But I wrote the Sparknotes practice exam (really fast and didnt put 100% effort) and only got 640… I’m aiming for 750 or higher.
What raw score would give me that?</p>