<p>Which one should I take?</p>
<p>Do colleges care for either one?</p>
<p>Which one looks better if I get a high score?</p>
<p>E looks better if u get a higher score cause less people do (less then 1% get 800 on E while about 3% get 800 on M)</p>
<p>Which one did you take, Xylem101?</p>
<p>I've actually heard the opposite, that most people get a better score on E. But then again, better score doesn't really mean a better curve...I really have no idea. It probably just depends on your own strengths and weaknesses.</p>
<p>I'm also not sure if one is looked upon more favorably than the other.</p>
<p>where can you find the stats for these sat II's?</p>
<p>If I recall correctly, Collegeboard has that info. I think it also came with the test score report for any SAT II's you took.</p>
<p>By the way, does anyone think it's meaningful to take both E & M biology tests?</p>
<p>Just take the one that correlates with your strengths. I'd say that an 800 on M would look better than a 790 on E, even though the score difference is minimal.</p>
<p>I have a question. Would taking SAT II Biology E and SAT II Biology M count as two different subject tests? I doubt it though.</p>
<p>no, it counts as the same test. only 20 questions are different out of the 80 all together...</p>
<p>i took M-got a 790 ...i couldve taken E but i wasnt so confident about it and i barely had time to prep for this thing anyways, but i would recommend E ...(I might take it ..lol..dunno y)</p>