Biology SAT II POST-EXAM discussion!

Test Preparation
481

<p>^ Maybe, but the '5' can be a low '5' or a high '5'.
Wouldn't colleges look at the SAT II scores in order to see where you are, since they're more descriptive (in a sense)?
I think I want to get my score hand graded..
How much is it, does anybody know?</p>

<p>[Edit]
I thought I missed 5 or less, with two omits. o___o
I don't know really, since most people were split on some questions.
<em>sigh</em> I'm so upset <em>sniff</em>
How did you do, tcuhna?</p>

<p>[Edit]
Seashell80, even though I was being "haughty," you still got a better score than me :) Congrats!</p>

482

<p>i actually haven't gotten my score back yet...they miss graded it as Biology E, whereas I really took Biology M. So yeah, my "score" is 670. :) I called them up today and they said they would fix it within the next week. Anyways, I can't believe -5 + 2 omits = 740!</p>

483

<p>I probably missed a whole bunches more....
But you're doing well :) 670 but only the raw parts. Good Job!
<em>sigh</em> I'm just really bummed. Damn collegeboard!</p>

484

<p>hmmmm...i wonder if we can create an estimated curve...</p>

<p>I thought curves only vary by one or two raw points!!!</p>

<p>I just don't understand.</p>

485

<p>curve sucked</p>

486

<p>Yeah it did.</p>

487

<p>when do curves ever not suck?</p>

488

<p>did anybody score at or above 770?</p>

489

<p>OMFG! 730!</p>

<p>The curve was ****! I missed only ~8 for a 780!</p>

490

<p>Yeah. Tell me about it.
The curve was *****.</p>

491

<p>gah, yes i agree HORRIBLE CURVE this time, i was hoping for like an 800 with all the other conv tables floating around-- prob 2-3 wrong, one omit = 770
wth EXCELLENT -- if i knew the freakin conv tables i woulda just cancelled it by now</p>

492

<p>yeah i thought the curve was quite harsh... i got a 760 and i'm sorry but theres no possible way i got more than 7 wrong</p>

493

<p>ooh sorry didnt see.. thanks kissthesky ^_^</p>

494

<p>maybe we were all so confident that we all did so well because it was such an easy test.. and that's why there was such a harsh curve?</p>

495

<p>The worst thing is that I studied like hell for this and didn't study for my bio final at all. I set the curve on my final 5% ahead of the second highest score!</p>

496

<p>i'm just kinda ****ed at totally misestimating the curve--i'm usually pretty darn accurate at predicting and figuring out the range for how many i got wrong (heh kinda like score choice), and i know i had at most 5 wrong so i figured that according to all the conv. tables i knew, i'd get 800 or at least 790. 'cept the conv table got uber-harsh this time. i knew i shoulda just taken the advice and taken the october test instead. eh i only had a month to study--</p>

<p>okay, i REALLY should stop complaining now</p>

497

<p>its okay.. we feel ya. i coulda sworn i only had 5 wrong too and apparently that got me a 760 lol</p>

498

<p>we should like protest CB's stingy curve and demand a little raise in our scores.</p>

499

<p>i'd be more than happy, but you know it would get us nowhere</p>

500

<p>haha i know. i firmly trusted the curve that had been floating around for a while... it turns out we are the victims of CB's occasional whim . LoL</p>