<p>This story in today's New York Times struck a chord with me. See <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/us/30mixed.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper%5B/url%5D">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/us/30mixed.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper</a></p>
<p>When my own son started kindergarten eight years ago, I looked around his classroom, which included many children from mixed-race backgrounds (even in our relatively white-bread town), and wondered, "How will these kids answer the ethnicity question on their college applications?" (Some of the ones I came to know best weren't a blend of just two races or ethnic backgrounds but several.)</p>
<p>Later, when I got involved in a grant-funded college counseling program in Queens, I found that advisees with heritages similar to those cited in the Times story were more the norm than the exception (e.g., Irish/Puerto Rican; Ecuadorian/Greek; Chinese/Polish; German/Indian; English/Haitian).</p>
<p>Many had fascinating stories to tell about how their parents met and married ... often when both Mom and Dad were young adults, new to the U.S. Most, too, had stories about overcoming obstacles on their roads toward college.</p>
<p>Yet it rankled me that those students who were able to tick off the "Hispanic" or "African-American" boxes would get a boost in the admissions process that my Chinese Pole or German Indian would not.</p>
<p>I long for the day when all admission officials realize that there are many forms of diversity and that the varied experiences that students will bring to their campuses may have little to do with ancestry or skin color. Some applications are now asking students directly about how they might diversify the community. But those nasty "Demographic" boxes, albeit always "optional," don't seem close to disappearing, nor are the "hooks" that come with making certain selections.</p>