<p>Things are getting pretty scary at Harvard:
[‘Enthusiastic</a> Consent’ at Harvard - FIRE](<a href=“http://thefire.org/article/13762.html]'Enthusiastic”>Newsdesk | The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression)</p>
<p>"Under most legal definitions, forced sexual intercourse can be considered rape or sexual assault only when the victim said “no” or was incapable of doing so due to the influence of drugs or alcohol, according to Meier.</p>
<p>Meier said that she and other students on the committee hoped to push the University instead toward an “enthusiastic consent” model, in which an incident can be called rape in the absence of affirmative agreement.</p>
<p>“The only people who lose out in this model are the rapists,” said Lila S. Schreiber ’12, who had also intended to serve on the committee." [Student</a> Role on Assault Delayed | News | The Harvard Crimson](<a href=“http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/10/14/student-reps-assault-committee/]Student”>Student Role on Assault Delayed | News | The Harvard Crimson)</p>