<p>Op,
I have not read all the posts so I apologize if I am repeating what others have said.</p>
<p>If memory serves, the UC and CSU system was set up to basically guarantee a public college education for the top 33% of CA HS graduates. If you were a CA HS graduate within the top 12.5 % of your class, you could get a UC education (maybe not Berkeley, but a UC education nonetheless). If you were a CA HS graduate within the top 33% of your class, you could get a CSU education. Also, it was set up that if you go to a Community college and did well, there was a well worn transfer plan into the UC and CSU systems (was it guaranteed?). And yes, Cal Poly SLO and Pomona are different than the other CSUs. Currently, things have morphed since that plan a long time ago, but the general intentions of that plan still stick in people’s heads. </p>
<p>Because of the class rank set up, there is a built in mental bias that the UCs are “better” than the CSUs, because you needed to be of higher rank in the overall CA HS graduating class, meaning higher GPAs etc. UCs tend to have more PhDs teaching, more money, etc. However, I know plenty of adults who went to CSUs who are in upper levels of business, MDs, etc. There are just fewer of them in those positions than adults who went to UCs.</p>
<p>Also, the CSUs are ranked in a different section of USNWR than the UCs so you can’t directly compare them on USNWR.</p>
<p>The well informed applicant will know about relative rank of certain programs between the various colleges, such as Electrical Engineering among UC Berkeley, UC Irvine, SJSU, Cal Poly SLO for example, and will also compare it with the private colleges. Again, I know of plenty of adults who went through the CSU system and are leading happy and productive lives.</p>
<p>As for “looking down your nose at certain colleges,” we get this a lot at my DK’s school. However, we do have to teach our kids that reality is more than just the immediate peer pressure that they are surrounded by. </p>