<p>Can't comment on the first two of your questions intelligently, shalala, but to</p>
<p>"are you ever allowed a car/ is it practical to have a car?
do most student live in dorms? if so, how is that situation?"</p>
<p>I can tell you a car is not ideal, but I do know at least one person who uses one. I don't think there's a problem walking anyway though =] </p>
<p>As for dorms, yes in frosh. year, sometimes yes in soph. year, and NO later on. I am in my second year, and already am living off campus. I definitely did not adore the dorms, but I don't think I would have anywhere. In theory though, you can live off campus whenever you like, even starting your first year! It's just to avoid the trouble, most people just go with the flow the first year. </p>
<p>"As for the quotation that mathboy took from my post, I mean that, from what has been posted, it seems like a student at cal needs to have a vision of what they want to do so that they can hunt down the resources and opportunities to do it. I don't feel like I have enough exposure to each of the diff. fields of engineering to pave a path starting freshman year. Maybe that argument is irrelevant; it is unlikely that most freshman know exactly what their career plans are."</p>
<p>WEll, to kind of take a higher level of the concern you raise, you want to know about how much freedom you'll have in either school. There isn't quite a plain answer -- at Berkeley, yes you will have to apply <em>to an engineering major of choice</em> though there is certainly an engineering undeclared option, which I know at least one guy to have taken. I also know someone who switched from Chem-E to something else, to EECS, to blah, blah..switched among the toughest to get into majors; he's a smart guy, but I don't think he had perfect grades [though pretty good ones]. I think if you really desperately want to not commit to a certain form of engineering, going the undeclared route is a good option. Though, a perfectly good one is also to sample a field of engineering you THINK will fit you, then moving out if necessary -- it <em>is</em> actually possible. You just can't have low grades and manage it. </p>
<p>Honestly speaking, there is probably a wealth of opportunity in terms of classes, top faculty, and research opportunity at both schools. Berkeley is definitely well connected. The one horrible issue is that in certain majors, people struggle to get into classes. I don't think this is a huge problem in the realm of EECS, for instance...I'm not even sure if it's a huge issue in engineering. But in other majors there's definitely that issue. [Heh, I have NEVER EVER worried about a class filling up myself...so it is possible to do that.]</p>
<p>One distinction between the two is that Cal is a public school...and hence, it is likely to be <em>considerably</em> more lax in terms of requirements + giving you credits for AP's and stuff. I know this from speaking with someone at Cornell...they force you to do quite a bit more in terms of credits. I like a school that is lax with such things, because I like the freedom to mess around with my schedule as I like it, not have to crowd it, etc. Requirements really suck. Classes can be pretty hard, and you don't want other things to worry about....this is one of the more important factors to consider.</p>
<p>I can tell you that I was considering schools like Harvey Mudd and Caltech as well, and I had the scores etc back in the day, but I <em>did not want to go</em> because they'd force me through their brutal system of several required courses. Now, some like that, but certainly not everyone. I have found Berkeley to be very lax, and really enjoy the freedom it gives me to take advantage of its fantastic academics in a focused way.</p>
<p>As for tastybeef's remark: well, Cornell's network being more powerful doesn't seem to hold for <em>engineering</em> in particular. Neither would it hold in terms of the math department. However, it probably holds more generally if you just consider it as a school, because it's an Ivy League.</p>