<p>thanks lin, that was quick! One more thing, aren't those candidates max and mins? don't we have to take the second derivative and verify them using concavity or something? In other words, take f" of those numbers and if it is distinctively pos or neg, then we have a hit. If it is a 0, we don't--hopefully I am not confusing you.</p>
<p>ordinarily when you aren't given the specific type of peak/valley (max/min), you need to verify with the second derivative test...if it is negative, the original function is concave down (looks like a frown--> n) and so it's a max...if it's positive, the original is concave up (looks like a cup--> u) and so it's a min...</p>
<p>Well, if you wanted to find the minimums from the equation, you would have to either use the second derivative and then if the x value is negative when substituted into the second derivative eq, it's a max, and if it's positive, it's a min, or just find whether the first derivative is going from positive to negative or vice-versa at the point you're interested in.</p>
<p>But since the problem tells you that that's where the min and max are, you don't need to concern yourself with that. You just assume they are what the problem says they are.</p>