<p>These are not very good takes on the two schools. Caltech is a better school, without a doubt. The students are some of the best in the country and the faculty is top notch. The work load is heavy, concentrated and intense. Pasedena is a nice city, but it is really hot and smogy. Old town is really fun at night. The connection to Occy is silly. Its like a highschool for the Caltech students, and they stick out like sore thumbs.</p>
<p>Harvey Mudd is a step below Caltech primarily based on reputation, and the fact that it isnt research driven. More mudders were rejected by Caltech and fell back to mudd then chose mudd over Caltech. Still Mudd gathers the elite student and the school does not fail to challenge. Many students choose mudd for some important reasons: Mudd faculty concentrates on teaching, not research; the claremont colleges are very diverse and offer a complete college experience; all of the 5c's has its own distinct identity and offers challenging courses in the arts, humanities, economics, etc...; Mudd kicks Caltech's *** at any sport, at any time, on any field.</p>