Can anyone grade my essay.. plz?

<p>ok so I wrote this is 25 min.. I want you to plz grade it and tell me what you think of my intro cuz am planning to use it more often whenever i could... Thanks!</p>

<p>The prompt: "We do not take the time to determine right from wrong. Reflecting on the difference between right and wrong is hard work. It is much easier to follow the crowd going along with what is popular rather than risking the disapproval of others by voicing an objection of any kind."
Assignment: Is it always best to determine one's own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit from following the crowd?</p>

<p>My essay:
Every human being on Earth has a certain goal. It is in our blood; we are bound to set objectives because it gives us a sense of significance, of existance. In turn, our lives in turn are nothing but rigorous courses to our goals, and it is the choices we make along that path that define who we are. Whether we make those choices on personal beliefs and principles or just to "go with the flow" or "follow the crowd" also defines our success from failure. Indeed, it has been constantly proven throughout History, Literature, and even our contemporary life that traversing that "Road Not Taken", like Robert Frost put it, is the sure route to success.</p>

<p>I once read that "you cannot transform a sheep into man by making it stand on its hind legs, but by making a herd of sheep stand on their hind legs, you can make a group of men!" and I didn't understand this statement until I read about how Hitler, the dictator of all time, made the "Black Shirts", his "people". He used what every advertising campaign uses, the general appeal because humans are inclined to go by what's popular instead of what's right. Hitler used that those people needed security, and that everlasting need to belong, against them. Basically, he convinced them that they were all "one" going after the same goal, following their leader's commands, a leader who in turn satisfied their lust for power and significance. And indeed it worked! Hitler was eventually successful to transform so many young adults into advocates of his "cause" that he moved from the "ex-con" who just got out of prison to the leader of the World in no time! True, that the World then had to suffer for years to come, but it was all because of the human vice to "be lead", to go with the fad. We give our oppressors the reason for their dictocracy simply because we are too afraid to stand alone.</p>

<p>Indeed, that need for security has led us to many failures thereafter, ending with the so-called "Arab Spring", the series of revolutions the Arab people have started against their arbitrary governments, but at what cost! The Arab spouse are now paying for their anscestor's missteps. It was that need for security from the people that led the leaders to put themselves in the positions of Gods just because the people were too cowardly to take a stand, because everyone was afraid of failing alone that they never said "No" to despair because the leaders brainwashed to think that "NO" means be left alone. And no one wants to be left alone do they?!</p>

<p>"Be the change you wish to see in the World" said Gandhi (a figure who is highly respected and who gained eternal life in the hearts of many just because he had the couarge to stand alone in the face of injustice and convince others to do so too).Indeed! It is your courage to stand by what you believe in, no matter it what may seem, that guarantees you success.</p>

<p>^^ Btw, for the ppl out there who know Hitler’s story by heart, and would prob laugh at me, I really didn’t mean to put anything “historical” just wanted to discuss the psychological point of view of why his followers … well… followed him :P… I hope I did it right and it did not end up sounding like a joke :confused: </p>

<p>I am aware there are spelling mistakes; I left them as is because of the time and all… Thanks in advance!</p>

<p>bump bump bump…</p>

<p>Prompt: Is it always best to determine one’s own views of right and wrong, or can we benefit from following the crowd?</p>

<p>Thesis:traversing that “Road Not Taken”, like Robert Frost put it, is the sure route to success.</p>

<p>You have a potential gap here because the prompt asked about morality and you are responding with success. </p>

<p>ex1: Hitler assembled his Black Shirts (really, Brown Shirts or SA. The Black Shirts were Italy) and was able to gain power although causing a lot of bother in the process. I am not sure if you are using this example to support your thesis (Hitler was able to succeed by following his own head) or the negation (the SA went along with their leader and disaster resulted). Trying to prove your thesis by negation is tough- especially when you claimed it “was the sure route”.</p>

<p>ex 2: Arab Spring. Not sure what you are saying here. Were the people following crowds with the status quo leaders, or in the street demonstrations that have now resulted in a government just as bad as the original one? What does this mean : “The Arab spouse are now paying for their anscestor’s missteps.” Does this refer to the people who supported Mubarak after Assad’s assignation? If you are using the failed Arab Spring as an example of people following the crowd to their detriment, then ex2 is another negative for your thesis. You really ought to make the positive case. </p>

<p>conclusion: You seemed to have slipped Gandhi in as a third example, and one that affirms your thesis. However the conclusion is no place to be introducing new information. This should have been its paragraph and you could have developed the “right and wrong” part a bit more.
The conclusion should be where you draw the threads of your examples together and show how they demonstrated your thesis. For a reader like me who was a bit confused you would be clarifying how the SA example proved your point. </p>

<p>Intro:
“a certain goal”- is that everyone has one goal? or everyone has a goal of their own? I kept wondering about this
“rigorous courses to our goals” - I dont like ‘rigorous’. Maybe ‘inexorable’ or ‘clockwork’
" it has been constantly proven throughout History, Literature," - we see a lot of these overly sweeping statements and they are a bit much. Maybe reword as “it is frequently demonstrated in History and the most enduring literature”. Conceptually I dont like absolutes because it invites the reader to start thinking of counter examples. </p>

<p>Overall I think this is a high 4. Just making Gandhi a stand alone example and having a real conclusion that explained the first two examples in terms of the thesis probably would have gotten to a 5.</p>

<p>So basically… it sucked… how can i improve the intro for it to be more general and stand alone as a universal template sorta?
thanks for the help, argbargy… ur the best, really XD</p>

<p>You are too hard on yourself. Readers will give you a score from 0-6, which is what I try to do. The graders are only allowed to vary by a single point, so a grade of 5 would be a possible essay score of 9, 10 or 11. </p>

<p>Most essays we see here are 3’s or 4’s with an occasional 5, so your’s wasnt worse than the norm at all.</p>

<p>I am not a big fan of templates, and frankly I doubt the graders are either. They have to read an essay in a little over a minute so I am imagine that they have a lot of experience with stale templates. </p>

<p>You might want to browser through this list of the essay prompts that have been used. It might be a good idea of review 20 or so works, events or people you have covered in school and see how they can fit these prompts. </p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/764514-sat-essay-prompt-archetypes-5.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/764514-sat-essay-prompt-archetypes-5.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>well, did mine seem like a stale template? i wanna make my own and not cheat memorize one! I have friends who, with all do respect, suck at eng but got 11’s and 12’s just because they memorized templates that fit… templates that a siz year old wud realize are just copy-pasted. I wrote that one in Nov, and got a 10, i had no conclusion… so i want it to be better u know?! I have the american revo, french revo for ex… and some books like jane eyre, lord of the flies, i know why the caged bird sings, and some others… any suggestions?</p>

<p>^ u know this is not how i usually write… I try to sound preachy on the SAT essays… shall i just write as i usually do?! </p>

<p>Here’s my blog for a sample:</p>

<p>e-goalscorer.blogspot.com </p>

<p>the “Rebellion… the unforgivable sin” is the one i want u to check out and see what can apply to my SAT essay…</p>

<p>And i repeat THANKS!</p>

<p>I think you are always going to have issues to some degree in trying to wedge a new prompt into a template. </p>

<p>And if you have been paying attention in high school I dont really see the point- you must have come across things you can use. To me it makes more sense to just review the things you already know and see how they can fit into a variety of prompt. </p>

<p>I used to like the idea of two literary works and one historical, but looking over the prompts I think two Historical are good and it would also make sense to prepare a few things on tech. If you just knew the men covered in “The Men Who Build America” shows I think you could do 80% of the prompts.
[The</a> Men Who Built America — History.com Videos](<a href=“Watch The Men Who Built America Full Episodes, Video & More | HISTORY Channel”>Watch The Men Who Built America Full Episodes, Video & More | HISTORY Channel)</p>

<p>Well it really depends on your definition f “school”. My school sucks man. Three examples…mm… I wouldn’t have the time to elaborate much… I’ll just memorize historical and literary examples for now. I’ll start by checking the link out. I on’ know the men who built America! That sounds new to me! I heard that using those cliche examples like Luther King, Gandhi, Rosa Parks, Mandela, etc… doesn’t give a very good impression since these examples are overused ad stuff…</p>

<p>Even the Egyptian Revo and the Arab Spring… I dunno tho… What shall I do then?! In the june exam, i invented an ex and got a 9; in the Nov one that I go a 10 in, i used American rev and Maya Angelou, (I didn’t have the time or space to write a conclusion).
And the prompt was STUPID man!
“Are people too serious?”… You can’t be serious! seriously, what was I supposed to write?!</p>

<p>btw, the cc online course electronic checker thing gave me 10, so basically a 5 out of 6…
Never trusted that thing… It prob just sensed a lot of words … -_-"</p>

<p>oh yeah… It’s called e-rater… fail name even…</p>

<p>I think it is not clear how your Hilter example can corroborate your thesis and also, I completely don’t understand your 2nd example :slight_smile: I like your conclusion but I think you can improve it by saying like you can rely on your own conscience to make the link between the thesis and the conclusion stronger. Hope my advice helps.</p>

<p>Well… It sorta did… How can you not get the second one man?! Arab spring?! How a dictatorship shapes itself?! :slight_smile:
Anyway… what do you think of the intro? and how much do u give it, over in all?
And thanks!</p>

<p>HEY! I hope am not pushing it but here’s another one plz help?</p>

<p>Prompt: Is identity sth ppl are born with or given or is it sth ppl create fro themselves?
Ever since the dawn of history, every human has been inclined to set a certain objective, no matter what it may be. It’s in our blood! Setting goals gives us a sense of significance. And in turn our lives are nothing but rigorous coarses to our goals, our definition of success. And it is the choices we make along that path that define who we are. We create our identities by what path we choose to traverse and what choices we make along that path.</p>

<p>If identity were something we receive, then most of the eminent figures, who helped pave the path for many generations to come, would not have had the chance to “make the change they wished to see in the World” like Gandhi put it. This quotation of his was inspired by his own experience in trying to change what appeared to be his chosen fate. Gandhi was like many other Indians who were under the British oppression at the time. As a human first and a believer in Buddhism second, Gandhi did not believe in fighting fire with fire. But instead of submissively giving in to the British dictatorship, Gandhi decided to shape his future, and later his entire nation’s future, by starting peaceful strikes, starting with the Salt March. Gandhi faced countless obstacles, and made a lot of missteps along the path, but nevertheless, he persevered, knowing that with every adversity comes hope, and that creating one’s identity is not an easy task. And indeed, it was his everlasting will to keep moving forward, that eventually led to India’s freedom from the British oppression, all by peaceful means. And led to Gandhi gaining the identity as a n advocate of peace and liberty, an identity of a person who gained eternal life in the hearts of the millions he has inspired worldwide.</p>

<p>Even in contemporary life, it is proven constantly that identity is a person’s to shape. “Don’t tell me who your father is, but tell me who you stand to be” says an old Arab proverb. And this is the slogan that Dr. Ahmad Zoel decided to follow. He was born to a poor family with no electricity and barely and food to start with! Yet he decided to go against the conventional dogma and get the education he always dreamed of. He would study under street lights at times, he would work and study at the same time, but all the same, he would never give up. And indeed, he succeeded to make his own identity as a Nobel Prize winner for his discovery of the fimto second.</p>

<p>Identity is not congenital; it can’t be bought or sold; it is the one thing you have to make yourself- a firm belief all the successful hold.</p>

<p>bump… bump bump…</p>

<p>peooopoooole?!</p>

<p>at least a 10, I would say</p>