<p>My SAT math is a bit low (700) (I just didn't have time to retake it). But I took the Math II and got a 790. I'm in Calc BC, I just made some dumb mistakes on SAT I...so to get to the point...is there any redeeming quality in my SAT IIs.</p>
<p>Who knows...
What is certain is that academic record matters more than test scores. If you've gotten As in advanced math classes then that will help. A 700 isn't bad anyway.</p>
<p>yeah...my math record's pretty solid...and I'm applying as a lingusitics major anyway</p>
<p>700-800 is moot point to them, it's fine either way, and don't think 700 is a bad grade- to think that is to be obnoxious</p>
<p>haha no...I was just saying that theyre at the low end of the Yale mid-50%</p>
<p>Is the difference between a 3.8 UW GPA and a 4.0 UW GPA moot to Yale as well as long as the applicant takes a rigorous courseload?:)</p>
<p>a little bit more significant, esp if a lot of people are applying for your school, but rank can make it a moot pt.</p>
<p>700 isn't bad, I'm in a similar situation as well. 710-->770</p>
<p>Your SAT II 790, alone, makes up for your SATI 700. It really does. They know that the SAT covers math you probably did in 7th-10th grade or something and they can expect that you'd be a bit rusty on some of that more trivial kind of stuff, especially if you're in Calculus BC. </p>
<p>I, too, am in a similar situation. I'm in Calculus and I got a 680 on my SAT I Math :( And I got a 760 on the SATII. Oh well.</p>
<p>thanks for the info</p>