<p>Musician dad, I have a son who was a preteen popsong “dilittante” for lack of a better word, but who also showed early proficiency in film and video production, writing, cartoons, etc. At the time, if you asked him, he would say he wanted to major in: “film, music, English and art” which used to get a chuckle.
By that time, his hs music teacher was pushing us to get him further outside training (which we didn’t take seriously quite early enough but eventually did) - but of course his English, art, multimedia etc teachers were also weighing in with their own sets of observations, ranging from filmmaker to actor to journalist, cartoonist, etc. He was just a mishmash creative kid. </p>
<p>Someone way smarter than me told me to start watching what he actually did with his time. What things he’d pass up a social opportunity to do. What things he’d stay up late
working on when he didn’t need to. What he did with his spare time. What things he tried to bring to his projects. For example, in his biology class where they were memorizing body systems he wrote a hilarious educational rap song that’s still a hit at his school ;)</p>
<p>Then he started soloing a lot in jazz band, and parents who knew a lot more about music training started talking to us about his options, further training, etc. But he spent so much time writing pop and playing other instruments and mucking about making films and doing techie things that in truth, he was a little late to the table for a performance-tracked trumpeter. On one hand, his energy and love of performing were palatable to the audience. On the other, he didn’t really start developing his upper range until junior and senior year, and technically speaking, he told us that he felt at a region/national level he neither was presently competitive in range nor did he want to narrow down his time commitment to a single instrument in order to get there. Summer music camps, by the way, helped him identify these things, so that’s a great suggestion.</p>
<p>Somewhere in there, he also started truly composing music, and writing pieces that were a lot more complicated than straight up indie pop. He won a few awards for these, and started to spend more and more time recording/sequencing etc. Through dual enrollment, he was able to take a few college couses in computer music, production and theory. At the same time, his interest was more motivated by the creative impulse than desire for technical mastery. So he figured out that he didn’t want to specialize strictly in recording engineering, for example.</p>
<p>When it came time to apply to college, he had a portfolio of songs he written, performed, and recorded, plus performed scores, plus samples of photography, film, writing samples, programming work, and design. And he still played a mean, if not technically perfect, trumpet I wasn’t sure if there was any portfolio based program out there that would appreciate such diversity (or to my mind, lack of focus ;)) but as it turns out, there are a
few that actually foster it.</p>
<p>The programs we looked at each had their own flavor: NYU Tisch Clive Davis recording arts (emphasis on popular music production/performance, less on western/classical music per se, which he wanted more of); Belmont Mike Curb commercial music production; Indiana Jacobs Recording Arts (less traditional composition and more technical sound reinforcement in that curriculum at that time); Miami Frost commercial production/engineering and USC’s at the time new popular music program. And his favorite - University of Michigan School of Music’s Performing Arts Technology program, which had four streams of curriculum: a) performance and technology, multimedia technology, multimedia music and composition technology and music engineering (my lay terms in an attempt to be descriptive.)</p>
<p>For some of the programs, he’d determined that he hadn’t wanted to be that far away for undergrad, so he did not ultimately pursue them. Michigan was in-state for him, and because of his high academic performance as well, offered him a generous set of scholarships that covered tuition – but even had it been OOS, it was still his favorite because he really did get to dabble in all the areas he said he wanted to go to school for way back when he was your son’s age. Even though his program is highly specialized in music tech and composition (both computer comp and regular) with music theory and technology, his particular stream of BFA degree requires credits in film production (scoring and sound with the film production team), animation, engineering programming, stereo
surround recording, mixing, mastering, interactive multimedia and performance, etc.</p>
<p>Now, it’s anybody’s guess what he’ll actually DO with such a specialized undergrad degree after he grafuates next spring. What i do know is that he will write, mix and otherwise muck around with music for the rest of his life whether he makes money doing so or not when he chose this route, it was with his eyes wide open that he would ave to find a way to generate his sustinance, and that this particular degree was for love, not money!</p>
<p>He still loves graphic design and web work, and through working with the company my husband and I own, he’s exceedingly proficient at it and will never have trouble finding work with a web development company or creative agency. So I suppose that’s his “fallback.”</p>
<p>If you see elements of your son in this, my advice is to have him look at some of those portfolio based programs and review the requirements. Help him find programs or teachers who can help build his production or composition skills now – those programs are competitive. For example, four students were admitted to my son’s stream, and at interview/auditions, there were literally students from all over the world and all on pretty much the same circuit to the same sets of schools. And encourage him to maintain the highest academic achievement possible – many of the tech/production programs consider stats closely and some, like Michigan, even have a math cutoff score due to the nature of the engineering school where you do have to take courses.</p>
<p>If performance is his primary goal but with contemporary/popular approach the berklee, USC, Belmont and NYU are likely stronger fits (though there are UM PAT students who actually have solid performance careers…but it’s focus, while varied, is not really popular per se, though alternative, indi electronica, yes…eg Ritchie Hawtin was on a panel visit last week ;)</p>
<p>I hope this gives you some fodder for thought and some information to share as his interests evolve. In my experience, showing early passion in these areas is not necessarily just a passing fancy…indeed it can be a harbinger of things to come ;)</p>