<p>Yes, he does, doesn’t he…</p>
<p>Isn’t it amazing how easy it is to imitate someone else in text-only as opposed to in real life?</p>
<p>Yes, he does, doesn’t he…</p>
<p>Isn’t it amazing how easy it is to imitate someone else in text-only as opposed to in real life?</p>
<p>For instance, if I know a user’s typing style, I am able to imitate the user precisely with little effort on my part. If my identity was not known, I might be mistaken for the user. In real life, I would need to imitate not only the “typing” (speaking) style, but also mannerisms, voice pitch and inflection, and body language. Hence, the Internet wins. :)</p>
<p>This thread doesn’t make any sense now</p>
<p>I look completely insane</p>
<p>Imitate somebody, you mean? :eek: OK, gimme a second. I need to look at your post history :D</p>
<p>Lol, I look like such a loser talking to myself.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>lolwut.</p>
<p>Idk…yours only make sense in context. Very short, Ye Olde Englishe style…I can do Ye Olde Englishe, but I do it differently than you do and I believe I know this from an <em>extensive</em> knowledge of your post history. With this color I’m trying to avoid both the CC and the Fresh themes, btw. Tell me if it doesn’t work.</p>
<p>Someone tried to mess with me. They got esploded</p>
<p>By who? Did they self-delete or was it the unmentionables at it again? (:() I don’t remember.</p>
<p>Well obviously, he was somewhat intelligent, seeing as his statements were true.</p>
<p>Probably got banned. I think that’s what happens.</p>
<p>You can for 15 minutes. </p>
<p>…Hey, wait a minute. You read the TOS?? :D</p>
<p>(I did skim them, actually, and they were fairly interesting especially the “unwritten TOS” :rolleyes:)</p>
<p>^Lol, that’s what I thought. This thread used to be a lot longer.</p>
<p>Upon joining it states that we are supposed to look at the TOS?</p>
<p>^^Lolol, very good example. But I don’t think “stuff” fits in with the rest. Sorry Warts–I gave him the idea of imitating other people. I meant to make a different implication, but <em>that</em> didn’t happen.</p>
<p>Yes, let us speak of the original topic.</p>
<p>I propose a new <> sign.
to stand for <obligatory reference=“” to=“” original=“” topic=“”>.</obligatory></p>
<p>What should the new topic be oriented around?</p>
<p>…Idk? Philosophy?</p>
<p>Do you think that a scientific mind has an innate predisposition to philosophy, or am I just weird? :D</p>