<p>Since the US News peer assessment is somewhat flawed (madisonform</a> / 08 / 2009 / News documents and files / Media - Inside Higher Ed), let's make our own equally flawed ranking. Write a list of universities and next to them put:</p>
<p>5 for distinguished
4 for strong
3 for good
2 for adequate
1 for marginal.</p>
<p>Consider each program's scholarship record, curriculum, and quality of faculty and graduates.</p>
<p>Not to burst your bubble, but the CC list will be even more flawed.</p>
<p>^ As any good satire is.</p>
<p>Did you look at my link wilmington? It can’t be any worse than giving Wisconsin a 5, ASU a 1, and everywhere else a 2.</p>
<p>
Sure. Since I am 1 of 2000 CC students chosen for this assessment, clearly I am intimately acquainted with each university.</p>
<p>5 Berkeley
5 Northwestern
5 Carnegie Mellon
5 UCSD
5 Duke
5 Wake Forest
5 Illinois
5 Rice</p>
<p>4 UNC Chapel Hill
4 Johns Hopkins
4 Boston College
4 Chicago
4 Notre Dame
4 William & Mary
4 Emory
4 Rochester</p>
<p>3 USC
3 Stanford
3 Brandeis
3 Lehigh
3 Columbia
3 Georgia Tech
3 Wisconsin
3 NYU</p>
<p>2 Brown
2 WUStL
2 UVA
2 Georgetown
2 Cornell
2 Penn
2 Michigan
2 Tufts</p>
<p>1 MIT
1 Vanderbilt
1 Caltech
1 Dartmouth
1 UCLA
1 Harvard
1 Princeton
1 Yale</p>
<p>The first person to figure out my methodology wins a cookie. :D</p>