<p>I am sure that you will make it to Cal Poly. You have high stats and your scores are superior than most applicants. Cal Poly is probably a safety.</p>
<p>really? even for mechanical engineering? boy, i sure hope so. i don’t like the UCs, lecture halls are not my thing, at least for undergrad. this makes me happy :D</p>
<p>My son applied for aerospace engineering for fall of 2010. Cal Poly was not his first choice. He had a 4.0 unweighted, 4.22 weighted. ACT composite was 31 with Math 35. His SAT was 1320 just like yours, with 720 in Math and 600 CR. He was waitlisted for aerospace engineering and ultimately was not offered admission. It was fine for him, but may not be fine for you. If Cal Poly is really your first choice, then I suggest you apply Early Decision. We found the year he was applying, students with lesser stats than my son were admitted early decision. Some of them posted their stats on this forum.</p>
<p>Just wondering: Were the lower scores admitted for Cal Poly just a error in estimating the total number and quality of the applicant pool using prior years data? Will it be the same in future years? Some schools have admitted fewer from the EA pool this year and defered them into the RD mix. Be interesting to see this years final stats.</p>
<p>Cal Poly, like any other universities, make admission mistakes, sometimes massive ones. Whether it is over admitting in volume or picking bright but lazy students, mistakes are pervasive. </p>
<p>Speaking as an alumni, I think that is why they have such a large % (+60%) of dropout from engineering school due to the constant and protracted weed out process. The weed out process starts from freshman level and ends with junior year engineering class sequence to rid the college of unqualified/uncommitted students. </p>
<p>Unlike the pre-budget crisis era, I think admissions now is trying to change this by being more selective up front on who they admit and ensure that they will survive engineering training and graduate (hopefully in less than 5 years). This is to haphazardly emulate the higher quality private college admission models of screening upfront and preserve at all cost the success of the entering class. </p>
<p>So to answer your question, I think CP is moving toward a ever tougher screening and more rigorous process going forward. The only thing that prevented them from adopting a full 360 holistic approach to admission (like UCs) is due to lack of funds for a thorough admission screening infrastructure.</p>