<p>My school runs by the trimester system and that really kills our uc gpa because of all the extra classes we take. But, can you chance me anyway? We don't receive ap credit third trimester too. </p>
<p>Freshman Year: 15 classes, 5 a trimester
GPA by tri: 3.6, 3.6, 3.6</p>
<p>Sophmore Year: 14 uc approved classes, 4 first tri and 5 both of the second
GPA by tri: 4.4, 4.4, 3.8</p>
<p>I took 2 ap's sophmore year (APBIO, AP CALCULUS AB). I only recieved credit for them first and second tri and third tri i had normal classes.</p>
<p>JUNIOR YEAR: 9 uc approved classes; 3 first tri, 5 second tri, 1 third tri
GPA by tri: 4.667, 4.0 :( , 5.0</p>
<p>I took 4 ap's junior year( APUSH, AP PHYSICS C, AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE, AP CALCULUS BC)
but only recieved ap credit for 3 of them first tri, 4 of them second tri and 1 third tri. (TOTAL 8 POINTS)</p>
<p>SAT: 2120 first tri. Should i retake?</p>
<p>I only have like 4 extra curriculars but am majorly involved with each of them.</p>
<p>Can you chance me for berkeley, UCLA, stanford, UCHicago, MIT?</p>
<p>You gave hardly any information beside your GPA and SAT score. You have around a 5% chance at getting into Stanford, 25% for UCLA/UCB, 7% for MIT, and idk*** for UChicago AKA how do you expect people to chance you if you give out so little information? For all we know, you could be that girl (obviously you aren’t) who made significant progress toward curing cancer. Then most people would claim you would get into every school (which is probably very close to\will be what will happen to her). Or, you could be that kid who just slacked off and joined a couple of clubs because your friends joined those clubs and all you really have is a decent GPA and SAT score. Then, people would probably say 0% for Stanford/MIT/UChic, ‘high reach’ UCLA/UCB.</p>
<p>Tldr: chance threads are generally stupid for the upper-tier schools, but they’re usually accurate within a certain ballpark given certain information…</p>
<p>whee: in terms of mathematical analysis, choose a neighborhood with radius epsilon around a point p in a metric space. (Chance thread) is a subset of N_e(p) for some arbitrary p \in the metric X, where X is defined as the accuracy of these chance threads GIVEN p \in X. you are being ambiguous by not giving us the p \in X…for all we know it could be a point p in some other metric, call this X’…</p>
<p>^ignore that…just some random comment…</p>
<p>Well this might sound weird but i did a couple of really unique things in my community.
Firstly, i started the underage cricket team of san diego. I started it from nearly 2 kids and now we have a functioning organization that teaches almost 35 kids ranging from ages 6-18. </p>
<p>Im also going to be trying out for the US under 19 international cricket team this may and will probably make it. </p>
<p>I also have 200 hours at the local library.</p>
<p>Getting an internship this summer. </p>
<p>250 hours of volunteer service at my temple.</p>
<p>In the speech and debate, model UN and academic league clubs at my school.</p>
<p>Thanks for the help.</p>
<p>Your ethnicity also matters as well. It’s illegal, but it’s true. A lot of decision making is based on “diversity”. Do you have legacy at these schools?</p>
<p>You have a very good chance for Berkeley. As for Stanford, MIT, and U Chicago, it’s very hard to tell. Stanford, most likely not. Your extracurriculars are nice, but they are nowhere near “Stanford” level. Stanford wants people who start their own business, rank in top 5 national for competitions or do some amazing thing (like the girl who made progress towards curing cancer). </p>
<p>UChicago, maybe…it’s a very high reach. MIT, probably not unless you have amazing scores, which you don’t. (Your scores are very good but not high enough for a good chance at MIT). You still have a chance for both of these schools, so don’t give up. Depends on personal statements.</p>
<p>Berkeley is almost a shoe in.</p>